• flooBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    193
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Removed by mod

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        They don’t censor foreign internet in Israel. Protesters of the regime can be heard from on the outside, there just aren’t that many of them.

        • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          If you’re forced to live in Israel you won’t be publicly voicing your opinions if they’re against the norm. One of the worst insults is “deserter” for those that did not wish to serve and “leftist” if you go against the murder of innocent people. Sadly being one or the other means problems for you down the road when trying to find a job and generally living a life here. It’s a small country, word gets around quickly and you still have to live here if you don’t have any other citizenship.

      • flooBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Removed by mod

        • paultimate14@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Your evidence supports that there are members of the IDF who are enthusiastically engaged with what they’re doing. I am not debating that- i think you’re right.

          But it’s important to remember this absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because you haven’t seen interviews of IDF members objecting to what they are doing does not mean those members do not exist. I would expect the IDF to have systems in place to minimize the external visibility if any such objections, which makes a generalization like that dangerous.

          • flooBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Removed by mod

            • paultimate14@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              It would be a logical fallacy to jump to such a conclusion without interviewing a randomly sampled and much larger population. It is possible you may be correct or incorrect, but you are jumping to a conclusion about a topic with insufficient data to do so.

              • flooBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                16
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Removed by mod

                • entwine413@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  13
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  If your sample is heavily biased, then the data from it is worthless.

                  • flooBanned
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    15
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Removed by mod

                • paultimate14@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  The beautiful irony here is that you are believing in and spreading IDF propaganda for them.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          There’s been multiple polls that show the vast majority of Israelis are behind the genocide of the Palestinians. To think the IDF thinks anything differently is absurd. These people arguing with you are living in a fantasy world.

      • flooBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Removed by mod

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Brainwashing can only go so far. At some point, (such as targeting civilian children) any sane soldier will crack and say “No”.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even if it were the case that they didn’t want to be there, “just following orders” is not an acceptable excuse for committing a genocide. The morally correct thing to do if you’re compelled to service in the IDF is to refuse and face the consequences, because they cannot be worse than the moral injury of being tasked with the murder of innocent children.

    • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If I was a news agency with an agenda I wouldn’t be broadcasting the interviews that are negative either. Those you will find on foreign TV channels, 10-20 years from now after those who are currently serving finish their mandatory service and immigrate elsewhere. Every once in a while some event happens which becomes difficult to cover up. Like the Pilot Letters from 2003 and 2023, but it is the exception rather then the norm.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      Even for the ones compelled to be there who have little (not no) choice, it doesn’t mean the IDF isn’t a terrorist organization. Other terrorist groups use force to get soldiers, yet we don’t pull our punches calling them out.

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      There are older documentaries where older IDF recount war crimes and being proud of it… this been going since the creation of this project … the two main forces that created the IDF are UK Registered terrorist organization.

      • flooBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Removed by mod

      • fodor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        My friend, it’s really important that you get the subjects correct. We were talking about Israeli soldiers here, and even if you generalize, Israelis. We are not talking about Jewish people on the whole.