And before you say that’s just a boomer thing, consider these comments from where I got it:

My Indiana elementary school in the early 80s too.

  • Xephonian
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    and attack anyone who goes through the door with whatever you can throw

    Gee, it’s almost like having a deadly weapon that can be wielded by almost anyone, and would do an excellent job at protecting those children, would be a good idea.

    Naw, let the children fight off bullets with books and paperweights. Life’s a bitch - no sense in coddling them.

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Of course, the solution to children using deadly weapons is to give them to more children. Genius!

      • Xephonian
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        Schools used to have shooting ranges built into them. And school shootings weren’t a problem. Kids are more than capable of being responsible around firearms.

        The only reason you’re gunphobic is because you’ve been brainwashed.

        • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Or - get this - it’s because I’m from a country where having more guns than citizens isn’t considered normal.

          Children aren’t old enough to vote, why the fuck would you think it’s a good idea to give them easy access to ranged, deadly weapons?

          “Gunphobic” is an absurd term, because a phobia implies an irrational fear, so fearing misuse of objects explicitly created for killing things isn’t exactly a “phobia” so much as it is a legitimate concern for the country with the 2nd highest rate of firearm homicides per capita on the planet.

          In my country, we don’t do “school shooting drills”. We don’t need to.