• david@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fantastic video, but it winds me up when they add padding to a phone video to make it landscape, as if no one in existence might possibly be viewing their phone-generated content on a phone.

    • CeeBee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because the content was likely preprocessed for broadcast news. Which means normal 16:9 landscape format.

      Vertical video has done nothing but introduce constant issues. I used to be a guide for Jeep runs, and I was also the video editor for the run videos (just clips from the run with music). And naturally you can’t be everywhere, so 95% of the clips have to be recorded by everyone else. Even though they were told “don’t record vertical video because we can’t use it” they did so anyways, and were upset when we couldn’t use their videos.

      And to be clear, this isn’t just a random video. We’re talking about a large organized and legally registered club, so we kept everything to a certain standard of quality. Vertical videos are not suitable for anything except a phone.

      • david@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why can’t you use it? Because your web designer isn’t designing for the possibility that people use a phone to access the Web, but it’s not 2004 any more and they’re living in the past.

        You showed your colours when you assumed that portrait video is of lower quality. It’s only of lower quality if you’ve padded it out and are watching it on a landscape screen!

        Technology to detect whether your webpage is being viewed landscape has existed for a long time, and takes very simple calculations indeed or just a splash or two of css to maximise the video size for whatever screen it’s being viewed on. It’s design laziness and wasted bandwidth to put the silly blurry bars or even black bars down the side of the video. But don’t force landscape on everyone. Smart phones aren’t new and they aren’t going away.

        I suspect that the majority of people who spend even a tiny bit more than half of their recreational screen time looking at a fixed landscape screen are well over thirty.

        • CeeBee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why can’t you use it?

          Because TVs are landscape. These videos are shown at club events.

          You showed your colours when you assumed that portrait video is of lower quality.

          I never said it’s lower quality. Not once.

          Technology to detect whether your webpage is being viewed landscape has existed for a long time, and takes very simple calculations indeed or just a splash or two of css to maximise the video size for whatever screen it’s being viewed on. It’s design laziness and wasted bandwidth to put the silly blurry bars or even black bars down the side of the video. But don’t force landscape on everyone. Smart phones aren’t new and they aren’t going away.

          No one said anything about websites.

          • david@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I never said it’s lower quality. Not once.

            No? This you?

            we kept everything to a certain standard of quality. Vertical videos are not suitable for anything except a phone.

            Totally not lower quality. Definitely not. There’s a full stop and everything. No link whatsoever. My bad.

            No one said anything about websites.

            Well I think the rest of us are discussing a video on bbc.co.uk, which is a website, and we’re doing it on lemmy.world, which is also a website, and when I complained about people making portrait videos landscape, I suspect most people correctly figured out that I meant on websites, so I really think it’s just you that assumes we’re talking about jeep club.

            • kajdav@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s such a shitty experience if content can only be consumed on certain platforms, which is what it sounds like you’re proposing.

              Watching portrait footage on a TV sucks, dude.

              • david@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                But the fuzzy bars on the side make it great?!?

                Watching portrait footage that’s been padded out to landscape on a portrait device is even worse!

                I’m proposing that the web designer writes a responsive webpage when they are sent a portrait video to include, so that if it’s viewed on a portrait device it fills the width, and when it’s viewed on a landscape device it fills the height. If it’s actually for telly, there’s usually no harm in cropping a bit at the top and bottom and at that point, feel free to put whatever you like down the sides, but there’s no need to throw away the portrait original for the portrait view of the website.

                Like I already said, the technology for writing a webpage that looks different depending on the orientation of the device being used to view it is neither complicated nor new. There’s no need to treat every medium the same in 2023.

                • CeeBee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Like I already said, the technology for writing a webpage

                  And yet most videos on websites are still proper horizontal. You can maximize and turn your phone. Everyone wins.

    • Lord Olgort@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah adding padding is always harmful. If the aspect ratio doesn’t match it’s not like the video breaks so just let the player deal with it. Anyone who has a problem with vertical videos isn’t going to be any happier that you added bars to it. Who is this solution for?

  • Lophostemon@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the trees root plates. Not really a safe thing to be around. Not very responsible to let doggo be endangered.

  • verysoft@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s fab being in the forest when this happens, although dangerous, it’s fun to walk along aha.

    • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is what I always wonder when they tell me a plant “tolerates clay soil”. Like does it really? Or does it just avoid it by spreading out all its roots in the thin topsoil? This would seem to be the latter.