• wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “Hmmm, they’re the Rebels, whom I would normally shoot, but they also are totally into slavery, much like my current employer… Decisions, decisions…”

    And yes, Civil War enactments feel really weird to me, especially given how often they’re short of people who’d prefer to be Union.

    • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      Former Civil War reenactor here. The lack of Union reenactors boils down to cost.

      The Union army had specific uniforms and equipment that have to be represented no ifs, ands, or buts. That isn’t a problem if you’re a single person or a married couple but it gets prohibitively expensive for families with kids.

      The Confederacy had a much more “bring your own gun” kind of approach to the war (given the lack of industry in the South at the time) which allows for greater latitude when it comes to equipment as you can see in the picture. This makes things significantly cheaper for families with teenagers that quickly outgrow their uniforms. My family portrayed Confederates for this exact reason. We could use five or six different colors of wool for our uniforms instead of two and the period accurate guns we could use saved a fortune in the long run.

      Later on after all of us kids stopped growing we ended up getting Union uniforms (or at least coats in the correct dark blue) and “galvanized”. Yankees typically win on Sundays (when the crowds tend to be bigger) but having them win outnumbered 4:1 is a little ridiculous. When there weren’t enough Yankees we would put on our blue coats and get put as far away from the crowd as possible to bolster their numbers.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      Revolutionary war reenactments are a bit better. I also think its funny that you can argue that the Civil war was about anything but Slavery

      • JungleJim@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 months ago

        You can argue about what was fer supper yesterday but that don’t make tuna casserole into brisket and baked taters. The states that became the Confederacy started the war, and the war was about slavery, or states rights to do slavery if you prefer the obtuse phrasing.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, because that guy was absolutely meaning to shoot Jackson. He just didn’t know it was Jackson.

  • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    When you think about it some of them fought for a side that kissed their sisters, and the storm trooper actually fought against a side known for sister kissing

  • roguetrick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My favorite is French and Indian war reinactors. No matter what you’re a colonialist bad guy fighting proxy for the seven year war. And you get to play like you’re a tough woodsman.