• OsaErisXero@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Don’t worry, SCOTUS will reverse it after another year of expensive litigation

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      and somehow create a new form of immunity, probably. I swear we need a consitutional amendment that explicitly bans courts from granting any kind of immunity without it being explicitly granted by a law.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        This illegitimate court is so partisan and they love to legislate from the bench. Because they’ll get away with it…

    • irish_link@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not trying to be a jerk or even joke. They legitimately are not around anymore so they can’t sue. A very small percentage of them have family members that sue but that’s about it.

      • TechNerdWizard42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yes. It’s a very stupid legal loophole the USA has called standing. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. But to get it to court you have to prove standing.

        This is the same reason why you can’t get a protective order against someone UNTIL they attempt something. Nothing is preventative, everything is reactionary. And if the reaction against you kills you, your estate doesn’t have standing.

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Technically the states prosecutors can sue them but only if the cop doesn’t have immunity.

        • irish_link@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          True, and the worst part is a lot of times they won’t because no prosecutor wants to upset the cops since they are theoretically on the same team.

  • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m confused.

    The prosecutor had already dropped the charges. Was this a Civil suit by the parolee against the sheriff and deputy? What is the actual outcome here other than “yeah, they totally weren’t allowed to do that. Glad that’s cleared up, let’s go grab lunch.”?

    • melodious_thunk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yup, civil suit. Which cops typically have “qualified immunity” from, meaning quick dismissal.