Jesus fucking christ
If you’re in the US and you can get a gun, get one right fucking now
Id advise for protective gear not offensive.
How the fuck did we get to a place where you need either of these things to hang a goddamn flag outside your building with your freedom of speech opinion on it? This is insane.
This is a rhetorical question, @queermunist nailed it on the head.
I mean it’s the same on both sides. People don’t respect people’s right to not want queer shit shoved in their faces all the time and assholes attack LGBTQ people just for trying to pursue their own best life. Creates tension and ignorance on both sides.
Something that’s not happening. But yet we have Christians all over this country shoving their religion down everyone else’s throats. That creates tension.
I think shoving anything down people’s throat is disrespectful
Without prior consent of course.
Wars are won not by ever fighting back but taking all the hits your enemy can dish out until they run out of ammo and go home.
Body armour won’t save you here.
The US, truly the pinnacle of LGBT rights.
This is the direct result of that "groomer’’ bullshit. When 1/3rd of Americans think queer acceptance is a plot to get their children raped it’s going to result in spouts of violence.
What a shithole. Maybe after they get bombed and occupied they will finally see the error of their ways and join the liberal rules-based order.
Hey someone died what a great chance to be smug and push your agenda!
Generally when people are dying is the most critical time to push an agenda of saving them.
Maybe they should have tried not sounding like an incoherent mess then. They’re calling for even more indiscriminate violence.
Wow, libs really do engage in projection at every possible chance.
Maybe after they get bombed
Explain.
So you know when the US bombs countries for “humanitarian reasons”? Like that. Like how citizens of the US think we should go to war to stomp out those backwards Muslims who will never be able to govern themselves because they all want theocracy so they need a bloody revolution and we should help? Like that. Or how about when a country has been colonized, underdeveloped, exploited, and devastated and then we give “aid” that results in more wealth being extracted and when they finally decide to stop that we call them terrorists and extremists and then stoke a civil war, arm and train the side most amenable to our interests and then bomb the country to bring about the change we seek? Like that.
So you’re rationalizing why it’s just to bomb civilians by complaining about how injust it us when civilians are bombed? You’re an incoherent mess.