Scientists develop game-changing vaccine against Lyme disease ticks::Researchers have developed a way to vaccinate people such that the ticks that cause Lyme disease cannot be colonized by the bacteria that cause the disease.
Peer-reviewed publication link
It should be illegal for news articles to report on articles without actually posting the publication link
Edit: pertinently, I’m not 100% sure that’s the same publication, as there doesn’t obviously even seem to be a journal with the title Microbiota (their citation)
Drives me fucking mad. I’m convinced that a lot of articles just read other news outlets articles and regurgitate it.
There’s almost never source material cited. I agree, should be illegal.
ITT: People who didn’t read the article and realize this is a vaccine they inject the ticks with and is more about proving how the disease works in the ticks gut biome than any human trials. We’ve had human vaccines for many years, but they were pulled from the market. Yet dogs can get a vaccine today.
Why were they pulled from the market?
No dog also gets a pill every months and it makes her blood toxic to tics so we just pull dead tics off her. They die before they can regurgitate and get the dog sick.
Both exist. The vaccine is different from the Frontline/nexgard treatments.
They can still get a Lyme vaccine.
This feels oddly fake. No journal of that name, nothing on INRAE (the research institute claimed to have published this). AI generated news? I wouldn’t doubt it. I know that Chat-GPT is very good at making fake scientific summaries (complete with fake references using real names in the field) why not fake science news? Also, the vaccine is for the tick… Not for us to use against the tick. For the tick…
Found it, real paper, wrong journal. Horrible article by Newsweek. https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-023-01599-7
Thank you.
Newsweek makes USA Today look like the Atlantic. Apparently they don’t use fact checkers!
2 days ago we pulled 12 ticks off our son and 34 off our dog after a forest walk. My brother in law got a bullseye last week and is being treated for to. This would change everything!!!
Lyme vaccines for veterinary use have been around for ages. Why has it taken so long for human Lyme vaccines?
As my vet described it: stuff that can cause cancer on a 15-20 year timescale is a lot less of a big deal for dogs than it is people.
There used to be a vaccine approved for human use, but it was discontinued because it wasn’t profitable.
Yay capitalism.
Yep it’s due to capitalism. It wasn’t profitable to develop treatments for ticks or even mites.
Is it profitable?
Charge more if not.
Yeah I’m not buying this “not profitable” argument. These companys have no trouble overcharging for other things.
This makes no sense… by the way vaccines for Lyme have been around for 10yrs. This doesn’t make sense unless you can mass vaccinate ticks.
This L4sBot reposts way too much old content from Reddit. Do we really just want to populate Lemmy with old content? It’s really killing this sub for me.
Please just let me go to my local CVS and get this. I’ve considered trying to trick a vet into giving me the one they give dogs (that was originally developed and used for humans but taken off the market for total bullshit reasons) but easier said than done.
I’ve considered trying to trick a vet into giving me the one they give dogs (that was originally developed and used for humans but taken off the market for total bullshit reasons) but easier said than done.
“My dog is very sensitive, please set the syringe here…”
“Sir, this is your own arm.”
“Whaaaatt?! Really?!! Hahahaha, how could that happen hahahh. Now do it.”
“What are you doing with that syringe, step-doctor?”
Nice try, I know all about the new and improved nanobots /s
Let’s be real here. Do we really need a vaccine for this? An estimated 200k people get this per year. It is almost never fatal. People can go years without even knowing or being diagnosed with Lyme disease.
I am not anti-vax, but A LOT of people clearly are. Maybe we should spend more time focusing on treatment or symptom reduction for those afflicted than vaccines and prevention for all people over non life threatening diseases.
This is an idiotic argument. Lyme disease can cause extensive and chronic suffering. A cold is rarely fatal, but if you were going to live for a year with one, you’d probably be miserable.
Anything that can make a positive change in our lives should be regarded as exactly that. Yes, there are other problems out there, but sometimes we need to invest into smaller ones to better how we are able to deal with the larger ones. Disease research and study is a perfect example of this, as better understanding builds a pathway to future successes.
From the Wikipedia page:
If untreated, symptoms may include loss of the ability to move one or both sides of the face, joint pains, severe headaches with neck stiffness or heart palpitations. Months to years later, repeated episodes of joint pain and swelling may occur. Occasionally, shooting pains or tingling in the arms and legs may develop. Despite appropriate treatment, about 10 to 20% of those affected develop joint pains, memory problems, and tiredness for at least six months.
It can also come back even if successfully treated. If you have another infection that messed with your immune system, like covid, Lyme can come back and make your life miserable.
It sounds like you think all vaccines are mandatory, but that’s not correct.
Your comment had nothing to do with what was said
Most patients can be cured by antibiotics 2-4 weeks of treatment
https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/faq/index.html
There were 9 reported deaths in the US from lyme disease from 1985 to 2018.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480773/
Edit: Lol at people actually down voting verified sources. I apologize if your opinions do not match with researched facts.
It’s not all about preventing deaths, it’s also about maintaining quality of life. On top of that, Being able to avoid antibiotics where possible is a good thing for preventing antibiotic resistance. Additionally, preventative medicine is almost always cheaper than treatment.
No no! Whatever doesn’t kill you makes you stronger! According to this idiot apparently.
Just because you have verified sources, that doesn’t mean you have a good argument. I don’t accept your premise.
This helps other vaccines, like maybe one against lone star tick AGS (causes allergy to red meat)
Lyme disease can be terrible. Any lessening of human suffering is worthwhile, and poor outcomes are not just fatalities. You can get treatment and still be sick with fatigue, pain, and difficulty thinking for more than 6 months. Not referring to controversial chronic Lyme disease, just CDC’s own statement. https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/postlds/index.html#:~:text=Although most cases of Lyme,months after they finish treatment.
I’m actually impressed by how bad of a take this is. Well done.
As someone who plays the check all my skin game when I go outside and pull off at least 4 nymphs… yes
My wife has suffered from post Lyme disease effects for the last decade. Yes we need a vaccine for this.
We’re kinda past the point where ONLY lethal diseases need to be prevented, yeah?
Is your stance really to go all in on treatment over prevention?
Not for all ailments, but for this yes.
I recommend checking out the CDC information or numerous other studies on Lyme disease and taking your own position rather than blindly excepting a random article on social media as truth and the only acceptable opinion.
Detection and treatment of Lyme is notoriously difficult. Why would you not prefer a preventive solution?
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, as the saying goes.
Bc despite their claim, op is antivax. There’s no other explanation
Watching anti-science folks here get downvoted to oblivion feels good
I suggest you read the research papers on Lyme and form your own decision too. The CDC is hardly comprehensive.
Like the fact that the infection can actually remain dormant and undetectable in people for long periods of time.
I’m also pretty sure the estimates on number of people who get Lyme per year vary wildly depending on who you want to believe.
Actually here is the cdc saying 476k
Anyways. Lyme is a tricky one because not everyone has a reaction and it’s impossible to say how many people are carrying it dormant.
Thanks, but I’d rather just not get Lyme Disease
The fact that they put effort into making a vaccine makes it pretty clear what the medical community’s position is.
Well, yes and and no. If the medical community was free to choose and not utterly dependant on financing from pharmaceutical and other companies, there’d be a ton more vaccines and medications available already. This stuff is really going downhill since the 80s.
Just because it probably won’t kill you doesn’t mean it doesn’t lead to debilitating health issues, which we could solve for if we simply vaccinate against it. Let the anti-vaxxers take their lives in to their own hands, but don’t stop medical advancement because of them, for fucks sake.
This is the dumbest opinion I’ve read in a while. I know three people with Lyme disease. One of them is a kid whose face drops on one side if they get too tired. And they are tired all the time because of having Lyme disease.
If we can prevent a disease with very little chance of minor side effects, then yes, we should prevent the disease. Lyme disease really fucked up a lot of people’s lives.
This vaccine may not even be used on humans. It could also be used on other hosts of ticks and may lead to a potential future where the disease gets eradicated.
It’s always easy to say it’s not important until you’re affected yourself.
This right here is very interesting.
Dude this is incoherent
I don’t care if this is don’t peer reviewed yet or not.
This is HUGE in terms of future potential.
Within our lifetime we will have so many advances in terms of vaccines and drugs to prevent mass debilitating and death diseases, due to new technologies available.
Woo! Let’s go science?
