• 51 Posts
  • 1.29K Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 23rd, 2025

help-circle







  • Ironic: the same troll (Facedeer) complained people were too paranoid about job loss:

    I think the online rhetoric around AI has been way more apocalyptic than the more vague and abstract political stuff… All jobs will be taken away and everyone will be reduced to serfs or killed as surplus population? Drum that into a sufficiently mentally fragile subset of the population long and hard enough and you’ll get them worked up enough to feel like they need to strike first.

    But what’s a troll without inconsistent rhetoric…






  • I respect what the guys who made it are doing, but if you read the description, it’s pretty clear they just made Debian + a script and called it something else.

    Maybe “meme distro” isn’t accurate, it’s meant to be intentionally inflammatory.

    Just read their homepage

    If you flash Ageless Linux onto a USB drive and hand it to a ten-year-old, you are an operating system provider distributing an operating system to a child.

    Or this

    Instead of an API, flagrant mode installs a file at /etc/ageless/REFUSAL that explains, in plain English, that this operating system provider declines to comply and invites enforcement action.

    Flagrant mode is intended for devices that will be physically placed into a child’s hands.

    Or this

    John McCardle… I am the covered application store. I am the person who curates the catalog. I am the person who will hand the device to a child. If the California Attorney General would like to discuss any of this, I am easy to find.






  • tl;dr this new policy is dumb and bad. References to specific things like Antifa make no logical sense as a grounds for censorship, because there were already reasonable rules in place to handle actual problems.

    In some cases, the content that Meta considers a threat signal is commonsensical. If, for instance, a user mentions bringing a weapon to an event, the company flags it as a threat signal. But in other cases, Meta’s process for identifying threat signals is more vague. Under the new rules, Meta might trigger a threat signal when a user posts a “visual depiction of a weapon,” a “reference to arson, theft, or vandalism,” or “military language,” if accompanied by the word “antifa.”

    If “antifa” is mentioned in the context of “references to historical or recent incidents of violence” — a category so sprawling that it includes “historic wars” and “battles” — that post will also be penalized. Should Meta apply this rule as written, the company could, for instance, restrict posts comparing the antifascist nature of World War II to the contemporary antifa movement.

    It’s difficult to believe any intellectual discussion would happen on Facebook, but this rule further cements the suppression of it.