I mean, this is a step worse actually. We’ve already seen mathematicians claiming that these systems have actively scooped them. Lots of academics are using these systems regularly.
At this point, every time I see a paper being “published” by an AI company, I’m wondering who they stole the result from.
Even worse, the software-based proofs are not the same as the plain text ones that they’re giving out.
There’s literally no reason to trust them, because it’s completely divorced from the actual text.
Fucking Christmas, it is.
He buys stocks, pumps them, then makes a lot of money.
The people paying have sufficient resources to make it back in a trade or two. They can ride his ciattails knowing exactly which businesses he directs his fans to next.
My guess is that they are just morons. It is really easy to be confident in your projections if you are a stupid person.
I’m a college professor and I’m not going to go around pretending to teach anything that isn’t related to my actual field.
I’d like to imagine that he orders Marco Rubio into the Oval Office and then beats him in front of the others to send a message.
For fucks sake they acknowledged the difficulty of getting started.
Same. I’m not wasting cycles on this bullshit.
I’m just the messenger. I won’t live in one if those passive aggressive hellholes.
This dude clearly thinks he invented bad parenting.
He doesn’t have to be smart to own significant blocks of them. Somebody just has to whisper to him that there’s a lot of money to be made.
A very stable genius who can differentiate between a line drawing of a camel vs. an elephant.
Had mine done the day it arrived.
Well that just isn’t fucking true. XD
I’m pretty sure they can legally take your house away from you.
That’s not true. My father was a terrible parent and that was decades ago. Tech Bros. think they invented bad parenting now.
Quick, somebody take that couch sitting photo of Marco Rubio and put him in the court in Photoshop.