There can be more than one “society.”

and billions don’t

“Snub” is a bit of a loaded way to describe not choosing a contractor.

I assume that changes must be checked by another person, so is there any etiquette around submissions? For example is it preferred to submit lots of small individual changes, or is it okay to collect together a large number of changes in an area and submit them all in one go?

Sandbox escape via prompt injection in 3… 2… 1…

Especially when the training data contains some gems such as this: https://old.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/kzoh1c/i_am_financially_ruined_agricultural_futures/

The mine, located about 1,500km north of Perth, has generated an estimated A$80bn (£42.6bn) in revenue since operations began and is expected to continue until the mid-2040s. More than 135sqkm of land has been fenced off from entry, including by the Yindjibarndi people themselves.

Despite the historic nature of the ruling, community members expressed deep disappointment at the figure. The Yindjibarndi Ngurra Aboriginal Corporation had sought A$1.8bn (£960mn), arguing it would represent one per cent of the production value of the mines while compensating for the destruction of around 250 cultural sites.

Fortescue had sought to cap the compensation at A$8m (£4.3m), while the western Australian government argued a figure of between A$5m and A$10m (£2.7m to £5.3m) would be appropriate.

Elder Wendy Hubert described the payout as “peanuts” compared with Fortescue’s earnings, according to the ABC.

Cost of doing business, as usual.

I expect that it will be far more useful in the programming sweatshops responsible for the Domino’s website et al.

It might be, but if the programmers don’t have the experience or knowledge to be able to understand the issues themselves then it may just create a lot of pointless busy work for them. Notice how even when the report was passed on by a human who has a strong incentive to make it look good, it was still 80% false positives.

Shameful behaviour.

Cloudflare have been accused before of some very sketchy behaviour to coerce customers into paying for higher service tiers. It wouldn’t surprise me if they knew what was going on.

Also, my understanding of containers on Linux (which could be wrong) was that containers are literally just processes running within specific namespaces and specific capabilities set. When a container runs multiple processes that is just multiple processes running on the host all within the same set of namespaces.

In which case the title is just straight up wrong. Reading the article, they seem to be using a very tenuous technicality to justify the title, which is that a container is not a Linux process: because it can be multiple processes, or it could be running on an OS other than Linux.

Lame.

They should try GTFO

How do you get 60k worth of goods in 11 visits?

Cosmetics apparently.

this is LLM slop

That medium post is 100% LLM output.

Eat my shorts!

And how many times was it catastrophically wrong? How many times were the humans catastrophically wrong? Yeah, I thought so.

Is hg-git lacking specific features that you need?

This is a poor title because it reads as though it’s the dust that is emitting longwave radiative heating (“exerts … radiative heating”) which might imply less heat trapped in the atmosphere if it has more opportunity to be radiated back out, but the abstract says:

we show that scattering and absorption of longwave radiation by dust heats the planet by +0.25 ± 0.06 W m⁻² (90% confidence)

The dust is absorbing and scattering (reducing the amount of heat reflected back out of the atmosphere), not radiating.

Probably left a fan on in his bedroom.