I write BDFPR from the bottom.
Though I’m also a heretic who starts G from the middle, so don’t listen to me.
- 0 Posts
- 276 Comments
But its not 230 murders per 100,000. It’s 289 murders total, for the entire population that year.
0.233 out of 100,000 were murdered.
That’s 0.000233% of 100,000 people.
phlegmy@sh.itjust.worksto Low Effort Memes@crazypeople.online•Covid vaccine going to kill me or nah?1·14 days agoSame for people who’ve drunk tap water! Makes me wonder what they’re really putting in our water…
Practically impossible for this developer? Maybe. Technically impossible? No.
We do have realtime GI solutions which don’t require raytracing (voxel cone tracing, sdfgi, screenspace, etc). None of which require any ‘special’ hardware.
Raytracing is just simpler and doesn’t need as much manual work to handle cases where traditional rasterisation might fail (eg; light leaking). But there’s not many things it can do which we can’t already achieve with rasterisation tricks.
Raytracing is mostly useful for developers who don’t have the time/budget/skillset to get the same visual quality with traditional rasterisation.However, in an industry which seems to prioritise getting things released as cheaply and quickly as possible, we’re starting to see developers rely heavily on raytracing, and not allocating many resources into making their non-rt pipeline look nice.
Some are even starting to release games which require raytracing to work at all, because they completely cut the non-rt pipeline out of their budget.So I’d argue that you’re incorrect in theory, but very correct in practise (and getting even more correct with time).
phlegmy@sh.itjust.worksto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•How many of you use Lemmy and ONLY use Lemmy vs Reddit?2·15 days agoI only use lemmy regularly.
I’ll still check specific subreddits which don’t have a lemmy equivalent, but not that often, and never signed in or with the official app.
Callbacks and decorators are fine, but callbacks/decorators to a function which itself takes a function pointer and returns another function pointer are crazy.
I’ve thankfully never had to use recursive callbacks or decorators, but it seems like it could very quickly become difficult to keep track of.
If you actually use code like this you’re insane.
phlegmy@sh.itjust.worksto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•"And my dick fucks your wife more than you do. What's your point?"18·1 month agoDo you say shit like that because nobody can tell the difference between your watch and a cheap one?
phlegmy@sh.itjust.worksto World News@lemmy.world•World Boxing to introduce mandatory sex testing for all boxersEnglish121·1 month agoSo, hormones don’t exist?
Intersex people don’t exist?
Trans people don’t exist?
And what, we’re all either 100% male or 100% female and there is never a grey area in biology?Don’t make the conscious decision to remain ignorant, you’re keeping yourself back.
phlegmy@sh.itjust.worksto Android@lemdro.id•OnePlus will ditch Alert Slider across 'all' its new smartphones alongside major AI pushEnglish1·1 month agoLooks like a piet program
Ooh look at mr hundredair over here, thinking he’s better than the rest of us. You’ll get what’s coming to ya, pal.
And don’t think for one second that I’ll be turning a blind eye to the rest of you positive balance freaks.
phlegmy@sh.itjust.worksto Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•how do I know that you guys are real and not bots?39·1 month agoThat’s a great question! Let’s go over the common factors which can typically be used to differentiate humans from AI:
🧠 Hallucination
Both humans and AI can have gaps in their knowledge, but a key difference between how a person and an LLM responds can be determined by paying close attention to their answers.If a person doesn’t know the answer to something, they will typically let you know.
But if an AI doesn’t know the answer, they will typically fabricate false answers as they are typically programmed to always return an informational response.✍️ Writing style
People typically each have a unique writing style, which can be used to differentiate and identify them.For example, somebody may frequently make the same grammatical errors across all of their messages.
Whereas an AI is based on token frequency sampling, and is therefore more likely to have correct grammar.❌ Explicit material
As an AI assistant, I am designed to provide factual information in a safe, legal, and inclusive manner. Speaking about explicit or unethical content could create an uncomfortable or uninclusive atmosphere, which would go against my guidelines.A human on the other hand, would be free to make remarks such as “cum on my face daddy, I want your sweet juice to fill my pores.” which would be highly inappropriate for the given context.
🌐 Cultural differences
People from specific cultures may be able to detect the presence of an AI based on its lack of culture-specific language.
For example, an AI pretending to be Australian will likely draw suspicion amongst Australians, due to the lack of the word ‘cunt’ in every sentence.💧Instruction leaks
If a message contains wording which indicates the sender is working under instruction or guidance, it could indicate that they are an AI.
However, be wary of predominantly human traits like sarcasm, as it is also possible that the commenter is a human pretending to be an AI.🎁 Wrapping up
While these signs alone may not be enough to determine if you are speaking with a human or an AI, they may provide valuable tools in your investigative toolkit.
Resolving confusion by authenticating Personally Identifiable Information is another great step to ensuring the authenticity of the person you’re speaking with.Would you like me to draft a web form for users to submit their PII during registration?
phlegmy@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•Former Meta exec (Nick Clegg) says asking for artist permission will kill AI industryEnglish28·1 month agoCool, so I’ll get started on building an automated business that sells cheap access to all the music, movies and shows on the streaming services.
Getting consent for each title would basically kill my business and would be implausible, so I’ll just assume it’s ok.
I liked the visuals / cinematography of the 2021 version, but I haven’t gotten around to watching part 2 because I’m not really invested in the story.
It felt like a lore dump that didn’t really build much connection to the characters, followed by a bit of action and some heavy sequel-baiting.
Totally understandable.
Sounds like you have plenty of more important things to focus on right now.It probably sounds like I’m really trying to sell you on games now, but did you know there’s games and mods built specifically for blind people?
I’m not saying you or your wife should play them, I just thought it was an interesting coincidence, as I’ve actually developed a couple of audio games before.Anyway, I’ll leave you to go focus on what matters, not my rambling or videogames.
Fair enough.
I’m not going to argue about what does or doesn’t appeal to you personally, and I know you probably didn’t list every single game you’ve ever interacted with, but it sounds like action-heavy games aren’t your thing?There’s plenty of puzzle games, and games that revolve around creativity though.
Minecraft got insanely popular partially because it allows you to express so much creativity.If you consider giving games another chance, I would recommend the recently released indie puzzle game ‘blue prince’. It involves a lot of creative thinking to overcome its challenges.
That’s kind of wild to me. There’s so many unique types of games, and not a single one interested you?
That’s like not being interested in an entire media category.I can understand not relating to the gamer culture, but even my grandma games on her tablet.
Agreed. I don’t understand the people who claim it’s easier to work with, or better for prototyping.
Automatic typing exists. Type casting exists and is even handled automatically in some scenarios. Languages like java and C# can manage memory for you, and have the same portability and runtime requirement as python.
Prototyping in python and then moving to another language later makes no sense to me at all.
I think it’s context dependent.
The field is called mathematics, but I see math as a short form of mathematic or mathematical.
Calling something a ‘math’ question or a ‘maths’ question both make sense. But something like “I hate math” sounds like you hate a singular mathematic, which sounds weirder to me than “I hate maths” (the field).
What? No. That would be crazy.