There’s some sampling bias at play because you don’t hear about the less flashy examples. I use machine learning for particle physics, but there’s no marketing nor outrage about it.

Almost as if it’s artificial.

Sure, but people seem to buy into that very buzz wordyness and ignore the usefulness of the technology as a whole because “ai bad.”

Beets, bears, Battlestar Galactica.

I’ll scratch it or lose it, and if I don’t, I’ll have a pile of plastic crap I don’t want. I’m not really worried about digital media being taken away, and I could find it again if need be.

I mean, I don’t want to either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

G

Gerrymandering affects the house. It’s the electoral college that affects the presidential election.

I dunno, I typically made friends with the people I worked on projects and studied with.

More about not making any sense than honesty, honestly. But it’s pretty fun, dive deeper.

SOME OF US ARE TRYING TO EAT ASS AND HEAR MEMES OVER HERE. AAAROOO.

Could have sub for popular_opinion and automatically cross-post submissions that are under 50% to unpopular_opinion.

Then you could see how popular an unpopular opinion is.

Seriously, their bias is right in the name.

Math was not invented. It’s was discovered.

They do this all the time, it’s really gross, take it as a badge of honor.

A cunning linguist once said

The bunk part is the overconfidence in the conclusion, not necessarily the ponderance.

Because people are more than someone else’s summation and over-simplification of their evolutionary history.

If they weren’t, then social evolution wouldn’t exist. Hence, the alt-right adoption.

That’s the bunk, that, and they were being a total dildo.

Jokes on them, they didn’t know we were already immune to pompous xenophobes by living here.

This guy takes care of himself …better keep an eye on 'em.