It’s honestly so hard to take them seriously.
It’s honestly so hard to take them seriously.
Naw bro it’s neat
On top of that, it’s apparently used in astronomy to represent clusters of stars, like a constellation.
Isn’t that kind of perfect though
Literally billions of people.
He’s credited as the author of Chapter 7 (Intelligence) on their website. https://www.project2025.org/policy/
The information regarding his position is from linkedIn.
For his authorship or his new position?
If you think it’s news that Meta’s new public policy director, Dustin Carmack, is a Project 2025 co-author,
Consider dropping a tip to your preferred news outlet. I’ve already sent an email to The Verge’s tipline and I implore you to do the same.
https://www.theverge.com/c/tech/22579076/how-to-tip-the-verge-email-signal-and-more
Looks like the datasets consist of every poll from October and November. Would love to see a time axis.
I think the consensus is generally that it’s better data analysis but most of the journalistic team is gone. Still plenty of solid stuff. I would say it’s probably competitive with a couple of other similarly lightweight models and teams/individuals. Nate Silver’s kind of gone off the deep end since he least.
TL;DR: Articles on mastodon will now automatically link to the author’s fediverse handle.
TL;DR: Articles on mastodon will now automatically link to the author’s fediverse handle.
And it wasn’t the last time. Remember super Tuesday?
In my memory people considered them meh at best but I had some fun. I remember the DS version in particular being pretty dope.
Stopping out seems to be an industry term that refers to semi-quitting school with an intent to return.
What does harassment mean in this context?
Why tf would you associate with men who would punish you if you don’t “live up to a masculine ideal”?
It’s not like men are ever given an explicit choice. Very frequently this means older male relatives.
My problem with this is these new qualities are just as likely to be used to build a toxic hierarchy. The problem seems to me to be not just the qualities themselves but the competitive nature that is more or less beaten into boys at a young age.
I think we’re splitting hairs here. They don’t want to because they feel like they can’t do so without repurcussions.
This is absolutely true and I’m always surprised there isn’t more acknowledgement in progressive women’s circles. Simple polling shows that roughly a third of women hold all men to these standards but there are significantly more who exclusively apply it to potential partners (speaking from a very US-centric perspective).
The honest solution is that women who think this way are simply not good partners, and should be avoided to whatever degree is possible.
Ok but for real tho. The average American severely underestimates how far you can get on rice, beans, lentils and chickpeas.