• 2 Posts
  • 2.05K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2025

help-circle
  • On paper they are “anti authoritarian”. But, it’s not an ideology that actually has the ability to maintain itself. It’s like the right wing version of Anarchism in that there is no good historical example of it being able to maintain its structures.

    For anarchist, the failure comes from pressure of external forces and is not able to defend from imperial powers.

    For libertarians, the failures are internal. Without a capitalist state to maintain it; the contradictions of capitalism are overwhelming. The “ancap” systems can’t even reach a “true ancap” stateless society before it’s capitalist are begging for the state to defend them and bail them out. Which often just shifts into a state run under an “authoritarian” like dictatorship that serves the interest of capital.

    The real material result of libertarian thought just devolves into capitalism with no liberal democracy. With no liberal democracy to absorb the frustrations of the masses; the remaining state turns to more direct militant measures to maintain itself.


  • wheezy@lemmy.mltoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldhorseshoe theory (?)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 minutes ago

    It’s what happens when you don’t have the the ability to analyze through dialectical materialism. It’s confusing when suddenly the fascist mad man is seemingly taking the same stance as “tankies” on normalizing relations with a non violent country who’s only crime has been being victim of a genocidal campaign over half a century ago. Trump likes Kim for the same reason that he likes Xi. He thinks they are actually the evil dictators that the US makes them out to be. He wants to be an evil dictator. He will always respect any leader that panders to his ego and treats him like a leader. Ironically, Western countries are bad at this. It’s why he hates europe. Hell, Mamdani was smart enough to play a similar game of charisma. That’s the dialectics. At least from what we are hearing from Trump. It’s why he says things like this.

    The main material reason is that the defeat in Iran has made any chance of the US maintaining its military in East Asia laughable. It cannot maintain its illusion of China being a threat. If China was going to invade Taiwan it would have done it. Instead, China cut its oil imports to help all of its Asian neighbors. The dream of a “shift to Asia” that happened under Obama is gone. The US power in West Asia is dying and they are pulling weapons and troops from East Asia to desperately attempt to hold onto it. They are stuck with capital invested in a region that they are showing absolute failure and weakness in. With capital investments in Israel and the military industrial complex Trump is being pressured to just “bring things back to how they were”. They never will be. It may take a long time before that is admitted. I expect another round of bombing campaigns and maybe even a desperate small ground troop invasion to attempt to save face and “claim the strate”. But this likely will fail and remain in this denial state for some time; ending through a different president most likely.

    He will continue to deny the defeat and soon desperately shift to the one region of the world US capital can continue to exploit: South America.

    Some of this is me mixing in my own predictions. Feel free to critize that. But, we obviously all know “JDPON Don” falls into the correct position sometimes, often because of his own ego and the shifting global relations in the face of a dying empire.

    TLDR: The “tankies” are against American Imperialism. American Imperialism is losing its power and is forced by material circumstances to take actions that “tankies” would consider good. Trump is appealing to the “strong man” in Kim to make his weak move (failed Iran war causing troops and weapons to be removed) look like strength.


  • wheezy@lemmy.mltoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldShitty parking tip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I really wish people that do this didn’t pull into the bike lane. Like, the cars aren’t getting by because they pulled into the bike lane. They are literally just deciding to block the cars AND the bikes. Like, I understand the instinct to “pull over”. But there isn’t really anything you’re doing to be less annoying by giving the cars 2-3 more ft of clearance.

    Edit: I’m thinking about the typical two lane (each direction) road. They are still blocking a lane fully. People have to get over and zipper at the blocked lane.






  • That’s why Mamdani style “sewer socialism” is so important right now for breaking people out of it. We start with showing the country that we can fill pots holes, provide childcare, and reduce grocery prices, they will break out of their matrix pretty quickly.

    Americans aren’t use to having a government that actually functions. But, because their expectations are so low the bar for changing their minds is also very low. We just have to win power to make enough people believe it’s actually possible. And once that happens, well, we’ll be able to make changes nationally one way or another.


  • These gloves are going to kill or injure more ICE agents than they will innocent people. There is a reason tasers can be dropped by the user. There is a reason that they shoot wired tips at a specific target.

    We’re gonna start being able to identify ICE agents from the burns on their hands when these dumb fucking comic book style tasers start malfunctioning.


  • https://youtu.be/uinazUYqqPc?t=218

    The establishment Democrats will lose in November if they don’t change their positions on datacenters. I want this guy to win over a Republican. But he will lose to the Republican that is anti datacenter (at least in their messaging).

    This was a softball question. He was meant to say “I don’t want to defund the police but I want to abolish ICE”. Instead he talked weak on datacenters and “economic opportunities”. Datacenters aren’t economic opportunities. They are a cancer on any community they are built in. People aren’t that dumb. They can tell this means “more datacenters but we’ll try to make them less awful”.

    This is why we need DSA candidates winning and endorsed by Bernie and AOC. These “safe” Democrats will lose.

    I really am starting to believe that the Democratic party is being encouraged into unpopular positions by their donors. Millions of donations from datacenters telling them to “be reasonable” on them. While, these same companies will fund the Republican campaign and say “go ahead and shit on us to win. We know you don’t mean it”.

    Lying is OP. And Democrats won’t even lie (or even avoid in this case) about their support for a nationally unpopular position.

    This should be a massive red flag to anyone that actually wants Democrats to win in November. David Crowley is the perfect example of how the Democratic party establishment can throw away wins in a historically unpopular year for Republicans.


  • The propaganda is so bad that there are a non negligible amount of people that read this story and their first thought will be to blame this person for being a “traitor to America” for not supporting our economy by paying for overpriced healthcare, or because they don’t have a good enough job to provide insurance.

    There are working class people out there with the boot so far down their throat they will get angry at anyone pointing to how ridiculous of a world we live in.

    It’s like our entire culture in America is just filled with sunk cost fallacy and the false belief that as soon as we make things better that that will be right after THEY just became a billionaire.

    Everyone is so tired and exhausted from overworking and getting nothing in return that the only dream they have is of being in the position of their boss one day and get to be the dickhead that fucks everyone else over.

    We literally can’t even imagine very basic things that most of the world enjoys.




  • wheezy@lemmy.mltoFuck Cars@lemmy.worldCrazy how...
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    China was capable of doing it. Oh, but they have central planning and blah blah blah. Yeah, let’s do that then. Let’s lay some track. If “freedom” means no functional transit but se still get the surveillance state. And “China bad no freedom” means you get a surveillance state but also get functional transit I’ll take Chinas system please. If I’m gonna have cameras watching me wherever I go; I’d at least like to be able to actually go somewhere.





  • You are aware, that “European liberals” are something entirely different compared to what the US perceives as “liberal”?

    Yes, I’m using the word in the same way you are referring to. But you’re referring to the economic part of it. I’m referring to “liberal democracy” and the focus on process over outcome. You can’t understand “liberalism” outside of a class based understanding of its role in bourgeoise democracy.

    Europe isn’t a country. And Greenland isn’t even an official member of the EU, it’s a territory of Denmark, under Danish jurisdiction.

    Yes, which is why I referred to it as such. Did you miss the part where I referred to it as a territory? I’m not sure what point you’re arguing here. I definitely refer to “Europe and the EU” interchangeably sometimes. That’s my mistake if that wasn’t clear. But when talking about foreign policy that is how these relationships happen.

    You are, however, doing exactly what I am critizing. Pointing to “tied hands” in the face of a nation that is violating the sovereignty of a people and their land. THAT is my criticism. It’s literally with the systems of liberal democracy that are useless in fighting the creep of fascism.

    You’re pointing to the “rules” that European nations are limited by l that prevent them from working to an outcome in order to preserve their process.

    I’m talking of understanding how fascism exploits this. It’s why one may feel “safe” in the systems of liberal democracy. They are still functioning. But I would hope you’re able to realize that those systems are the very things that allow Fascism to creep and take control. It’s why it’s hard to notice “the line” in which liberal democracy becomes “Fascism”. Fascist exploit the very reasons you gave for not taking action. With a false hope that a future act of the system will stop it. (You’re reference to 2027 policy that will stop it)

    It won’t. It will at best delay to make you believe the system is working to defend you. It defends the interest of class hierarchy. It doesn’t defend the misconception of democracy that “liberals” believe in.

    The reports on land seizure are not inaccurate. They are preparing a normalization. The technicality of “delay” or “process” are the very way that they become reality.

    I can’t say it better than this explanation that I constantly keep in mind. It’s worth a listen for 10 minutes even if you disagree with what I’ve said.

    https://youtu.be/0YFdwfNh5vs


  • How many times do we have to learn this lesson? Do we need another “electable” candidate like Hillary or Harris so they can lose to the couch? This isn’t 2016. You can’t really be believing this argument in 2026 can you?

    How many times do we have to lose to Republicans with the “electable” candidate for people to realize that Americans will sit on the couch rather than vote for another “hope and change” candidate with no real policies?

    The country hates Republicans and Trump so much right now and the Democrats are trying to get away with do nothing politicians again. Stop falling for this shit.

    How many times do we have to “win”, nothing get better, and have the next election give us more people voting for fascist just to roll the dice on “change”.