• Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    But seriously you should learn economics. It’s so fucked up when you’re looking at it with class consciousness.

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      So much of it feels downright…esoteric at times, like a bunch of magical rules and spells that are completely arbitrary and mysterious. The sheer amount of bending over backwards economics do to try and explain away stuff like the labour theory of value is astonishing.

      • Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yea, you’ve just got to ignore all that stuff and look at it through a materialistic lens; look at how it’s used in accounting and business.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      On purely economic lens, dumping toxic waste into rivers is more efficient than looking for alternatives.

  • Tee@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Top image- bourgeoisie economist Bottom image- bourgeoisie economist (spicy)

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Biden got those rail workers their sick leave. Democrats are just too quiet about their achievements.

      • GiantSpoonWielder@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just liberal bait, best to ignore them.

        When rail unions were preparing for a potential strike, Biden made it illegal for them to do so.

        Rail unions wanted to strike for better benefits, vacation time most importantly as the corporations had them working a lot of hours with virtually no paid time off. Part of ‘efficiency’ in the pursuit of profit, running as much freight, with as few train engines and workers also means greater wear on the infrastructure and less maintenance work being done. All this contributes to the more regular occurrence of accidents, some incredibly damaging to public health and the environment.

        They got some minor benefit increases, but i don’t believe much, if anything, related to their main complaints. And now they have no real recourse. The only credit Biden and the democrats should get is from their capitalist sponsors.

        Here’s an opinion piece summary from a rail union member

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          They did end up getting four of them.

          heres a link. I am definitely not a liberal. I just read that they did. What Biden did was shitty. He should have forced the sick days.

          • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you read your own link, you’ll see that this is only for a couple rail companies, and not a guaranteed right in the future. It’s cool that they got something, but this is not a big win by any chance.

            Also 4 sick leave days is frankly too little for a critical infrastructure and transportation industry in the country that had 1 million die of covid.

            • Fal@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s cool that they got something, but this is not a big win by any chance.

              So you’d rather they get nothing then. Gotcha

              • albigu@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No, I’d rather a general strike brought the entire USA industry to a halt and the government/corporate classes to their knees, until the workers got every single one of their long overdue demands. Way to miss the mark.

                • Fal@yiffit.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ok, so, seeing as that’s not going to happen, you’d rather the status quo than the marginally better situation. Hope that works out for you

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              1 year ago

              I did read my own link. I agree with you. But rail laborers did get more sick days.

              • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Congress had the ⅔ supermajorities to override Biden’s veto anyways. All Biden had to do was veto the bill to say he tried to prevent the legislation as “the most pro-union president” but it was out of his hands, and he couldn’t even do that.

            • Sanctus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Well this is probably the only time I defended Biden. Usually I want to quit my job and molotov government buildings. But I usually vote democrat while wishing there was a laborers party in the US. So left somewhere.

              • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                In that case, maybe stick around and you might learn something about what we believe!

                Maybe read some theory — you might end up agreeing with it!

                • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Like I’m not already a socialist, mate. Bunch a crabs in a bucket right here.

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        What don’t you get? You’re saying both sides are the same even though that’s just factually untrue

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Baal was one of the ancient Canaanite gods, one of those deities worshipped as king of the world, dying and resurrecting every year, also was god of storms, fertility and cattle.

              His name got somehow twisted into an evil god because of ancient Hebrews who smeared him incessantly in the Bible since it was also one of the main gods of hellenistic Seleucid Empire and Selucids were forcing Jews to woship him, causing tons of religious tensions - and they were doing it in the time that significant parts of Bible got compiled so naturally the current issues took main place in those.

              Moloch is also Canaanite god, but it’s kinda discussable if it was even a separate god or just other title of the same god (Moloch is just Melek which means “king”, while Baal means “lord”). Also got smeared in Bible and later christian theology for the sacrifice of newborns. And while that practice is confirmed, it’s still unclear if it’s even tied to Moloch/Baal and most probably the sacrifices werent alive but the babies that were stillborn or died soon after birth, since newborn mortality in those time was huge.

              In short, it’s incredibly convoluted part of ancient mythology with tons of missing context, but the Elder Scrolls daedric prince Molag Bal is a combination of both names in fully biblical sense since as the god of rape, cruelty and domination he’s probably the most evil and nasty of all daedras (which is an achievement since the competition in evil and nastiness is harsh there).

            • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s likely the other way around. Molag Bal - Moloch Baal. “Baal” just means “lord” or “master”

          • Fal@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you don’t care about actually helping anyone. Because if you’re sitting there and trying to say that no one is better off with the democrats than the republicans, it’s not wonder you’re on lemmygrad. You’re either 12, or have the critical thinking skills of a 12 year old.

            • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              trying to say that no one is better off with the democrats than the republicans

              Lemmygrad’s position is not that no one is better off under Democrats than Republicans. Instead, our position is that when it counts (helping the working class), both parties are united in giving workers the middle finger.

              • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not to defend Dems by any means, but there are some groups (e.g. our trans comrades) who are targeted by reactionary policies by Republicans that Democrats aren’t doing

                • LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Okay but the US is 4% of the world’s population. There’s millions more who don’t get to be trans because they get killed by the USA. In the past two decades alone is estimated (by US bodies) that they’ve killed 4.5 million people and displaced tens of millions more. It makes no difference who is in power, red or blue. In fact some argue that the blue are the more warmongering of the two. When you support them, you enable them. This is what people mean about culture wars and identity politics. Trans issues are miniscule and have an inordinate focus because they don’t threaten anything. People arguing about them does the square root of zero to affect the status quo of a vastly greater evil. They steer discussions away from real things and into LGBTQ stuff.