• roofuskit@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well that’s good that it’s already been fully re-mastered for streaming and this is just a formal physical release of those remasters. Whenever I see a new Blu-ray release for SD content these days I worry that they’ll just run it through an AI upscaler and try to sell that. Or worse, they’ll “re-master” it like they did on Buffy and and Angel.

      • roofuskit@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They made seasons shot for 4:3 into widescreen, puting things into shots that were not supposed to be there. They just plain didn’t do color correction for some scenes. There’s videos on YouTube highlighting how it was kind of a disaster. Unfortunately it’s also the only way to stream it these days.

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I have the webdl of it and its pretty damn nice. They did a good job on the CGI upscaling it really looks good, even if its still a bit dated.

  • beefcat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You see that, CBS? Warner figured out how to remaster and release their serialized '90s science fiction drama set aboard a space station on Blu-Ray. Surely doing the same for your serialized '90s science fiction drama set aboard a space station is not too tall of an order.

    With the WGA and SAG strikes shutting down all production of new content, there’s never been a better time to put your editors and vfx artists to work remastering an old classic.

    • MrGeekman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, sorta. It’s possible that the CGI files may have finally been located, but I’m not sure. As far as I know, the Blu-Rays will be 4x3 instead of the originally-intended 16x9 aspect ratio. The show was filmed in 16x9 and J. Michael Stracznski intended to have the CGI re-rendered at some point when it could be done faster and cheaper, but the files were lost before that could be done.

      Yeah, the DVDs kinda were widescreen, but that’s because they were cropped from 4x3 to 16x9.

      • beefcat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remastered CGI and 16:9 would be nice, but I’ll be plenty happy with the original 4:3 presentation. Assuming this release is cut from the new masters made for streaming (and I can’t imagine why it wouldn’t), it will look pretty damn good.

        Later DS9 seasons were also shot for 16:9 with a 4:3 safe zone, but I would still be fine with keeping that whole show 4:3 as well.

        The expanded frame wouldn’t add a whole lot to the experience, because they still shot to capture everything in the viewable 4:3 area. I doubt much effort was put into actually composing the shots for widescreen beyond making sure crew and equipment were not visible in frame.

        The problem CBS has with DS9 is the extensive use of CGI throughout live action scenes (like Odo shapeshifting). It’s a lot easier to get away with just upscaling old CGI when most of the relevant shots are 100% CGI and don’t need to be composited back in to the original photography.

  • PhilWheat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did they ever settle out the problems between Foundation Imaging and Netter digital so the CGI could be re-rendered?

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t mind the space exterior CGI being completely redone from scratch. It’s awful in a way that’s distracting, not charming.

      The Star Trek TOS CGI was controversial, mostly because of how few exterior shots are in the show and how the shots are mostly for framing, but it is an illustrative example of restrained CGI that makes itself non-flashy and is non-disruptive to a first time viewer if you aren’t looking for it. Babylon 5 could do with a similar treatment.

  • Zink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Amazing news. I will take any excuse to watch B5 again, especially if it’s an improved version!

  • kinkin@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s fantastic news! The anticipation for ‘Babylon 5’ coming to Blu-ray has been quite a journey for fans. The series holds a special place in the hearts of many, and the prospect of experiencing it in high-definition on Blu-ray is truly exciting. The intricate storytelling, memorable characters, and captivating universe of ‘Babylon 5’ are sure to shine even brighter with the enhanced visual and audio quality that Blu-ray offers. This release is bound to rekindle old fans’ love for the show and introduce new audiences to the magic of ‘Babylon 5.’ Can’t wait to relive those epic space adventures in stunning clarity!Looking to rip your Babylon 5 Blu-ray to MP4? Please click here: [https://dvdfab.org/blu-ray/convert-bd-to-mp4.htm]

  • DannyMac@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is exciting! I never watched it when it first came out, aside from it being on in the background.

  • MrFloppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Babylon 5 is so great. At the very end, unfortunately, I find it a bit confused. I missed what became of the host in the sealed vessel, for Sheridan’s child. Instead, at some point in an episode before, the evolution of humanity is seen (with the red eyes, downloading data from earth), before the Sun/Earth explodes. That should have been at the end.

  • MossBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I already have the series on AppleTV, but seriously, if you’re never seen it, do yourself a favor. This is some of the best sci-fi ever made for tv. Also, new animated B5 is coming out soon!

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oooh, didn’t know about an animated one. I’ve always been curious but 110 episodes works out to some 70+ hours of tv which would take me forever to finish.

      • MossBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is a decent amount of watching, but well worth it. I wasn’t even that into it to begin with. I just started watching because my wife was watching it. Then we ended up watching the whole thing in less than two months because we couldn’t wait to see what happened next.

  • stanleytweedle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I rewatched about 5 years ago and it’s just as great as I remembered it. Really thoughtful writing and performances. And old TV series seemed to give everything more time. With 20+ episodes in every season seems like they could let things marinate more. These shorter 8-12 episode seasons make everything feel too condensed to me.

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thats one of the things the SAG strike is angry about. Seasons are too damn short and get cancelled way too early.