• mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Looks like someone didn’t read the article. See part 4: Invisible Encryption. (Also note the Conclusion paragraph that explains the new functionality is only just starting to appear in clients.)

    • Hiko0@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I did. I referred to the current version and the comment that is has always been a great project.

      • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        41 minutes ago

        So you were aware that this announcement includes fixes for the encryption issues, yet you decided to post a comment complaining about them anyway, ignoring the point of this post and giving readers the false impression that the issues are unaddressed.

        And you did it just to contradict someone who finds the project useful.

        That’s not helpful to anyone. Quite the opposite, I’d say.