• LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    IDs can be full of stupid bureaucracy to get. Eg if you are homeless, how will you get 2 pieces of mail with a home address? And in some places, IDs cost $50 or more. IDs are not the only way to identify someone - if you forget your ID before flying, there are alternative ways to identify you. The DMV has long wait times and IDs are often mailed to people, the delay could impact voting if done shortly before election day. And disabled people may not be able to wait in line at the DMV. The DMV has limited hours as well.

    It’s more important to protect someone’s right to vote than to enforce an arbitrary ID rule.

    • TaTTe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So how would this system prevent people from voting multiple times or voting as someone they’re not? Could you elaborate on what you meant when you said “alternative ways”? I’m imagining something like fingerprints or retina scans, both of which take more time and money than a simple ID.

      Also I’m not too familiar with the DMV, but isn’t that for driver’s licenses only? Surely that’s not the only way to get an ID in the US?

      I guess my point is rather than allowing voting without ID, there should be better systems in place to provide everyone with an ID.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s the DMV or a passport in the US. Since nearly everyone drives in the US, the main form of ID is a drivers license. They tacked the non-driver ID onto the DMV as well because they were already doing most IDs.

        There should be a better way to provide everyone with IDs. But that should be done first before tying such an important right to it.