• Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Question for those who have already seen Oppenheimer: I have been avoiding watching it because I don’t want to see some guy celebrated (or focus on their emotional struggle) whilst ignoring the immense number of innocents killed by the weapon they were fully aware of creating. Is this concern reasonable? I like Nolan’s movies in general, so if it wasn’t I’d gladly watch it

    • bigkix@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He is not celebrated and his struggle with consequences of bombing Japan are shown (and shown quite artistically interesting) and with knowing that atomic bomb will change the future. Also, movie carries a message that is anti nuclear weapons and ends on that note.

    • mulcahey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was disappointed with this film, and I don’t think Nolan is the right person to tell this story. Nolan is so wrapped up in the Great Man theory of history that he’s incapable of telling a story about the actual social impact of the bomb. Did it kill nearly a million people? Sure, but let me tell you about this guy’s personal loss and his feelings(!). Nolan is happy to grapple with the bomb as possibly immoral, maybe, but the only person in this movie who gets depicted as a victim is Oppenheimer. And a victim of racism no less!

      (I also find it funny that a film about communist scientists has scenes in fancy hotels, because Christopher Nolan can NOT make a movie without a posh hotel. The guy is just so enamored with wealth and whiteness.)

      Honestly, if you want to watch a great movie about the A bomb, check out Barefoot Gen.

      And if you want to watch a good movie about state-sponsored killers living with regret, watch Munich.

      Skip Oppenheimer.