• dugmeup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Because it a a white elephant that allows governments to take longer to pivot to renewables allowing fossil fuel to continue for much longer than needed. It’s playing out in Australia. Australia is never going nuclear. But it allows governments to waste time debating and considering. Even when every forecasting body that isn’t tied to the nuclear lobby laughs them out of the room.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I don’t get it. Current nuclear power solutions take longer to set up, have an effectively permanently harmful byproduct, have the (relatively small) potential to catastrophically fail, almost always depend on an abundant supply of fresh water, and are really expensive to build, maintain and decommission.

    If someone ever comes up with a functional fusion reactor, I could see the allure; in all other cases, a mix of wind, wave, geothermal, hydro and solar, alongside energy storage solutions, will continually outperform fission.

    I suspect that the reason some countries like nuclear energy is that it also puts them in a position of nuclear power on the political stage.