• vivadanang@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    your background in traffic engineering included learning how much these modifications cost.

    seems like if we can’t have your ideal we get nothing.

    yeah, thanks, nope. but thanks for the ovation.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You seem to be under the impression that changing the speed limit sign is “better than nothing.”

      It’s not.

      It is, in fact, worse than nothing because having half the drivers comply with the lower speed limit and having half not creates a mix of speeds that’s even more dangerous than if everybody just drove at the same higher speed.

      • vivadanang@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m dubious and don’t care enough to take the time. whatever mr traffic engineer, I guess we just can’t have nice communities because it’s even worse to TRY.

        do you have any idea how pathetic it sounds? like a cult of apathy, doing anything is GOING TO COST MONEY genius… and even if it doesn’t work perfectly, it’s still better to try than throw your hands up in the air and accept dead pedestrians all the time.

        you do you tho.

          • vivadanang@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            oh now they’re scientists? even though they’ve referenced no facts, zero studies, but hey, let’s just make shit up ffs

            I can’t decide which is more pitiful - him lying about being a traffic expert, or your blind assumption that he’s RIGHT because he’s lied about being a traffic expert.

            goddamn, what a huge bucket of dumb.