• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        There are two types of apples, red apples and non-red apples.

        Is what the other person said. Paralels happen in certain game/sport categorizations, with women being a defined grouping, and all else (including women) being put into the open/other category.

          • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            20 hours ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Blitz_Chess_Championship_2024

            nope.

            The goal is to improve the women’s experience and make it more feasable as a career choice for the best women. Sometimes it gets controversial, even among women, but it’s a noble idea until women and men are evenly represented in top tournaments.

            Notable female players that reached near the level of the top men include Judit Polgar (Peak ranking : 8th worldwide) and Hou Yifan (Peak ranking 55th worldwide).

            There is no physical gender/sex/whatever based reason why women underperform compared to men, so until societal/environmental factors change, trying to enable more women to reach higher levels with incentives seems good. They are not barred from the open category (which people mistakenly call “mens’” sometimes) , so they can choose which tourney they attend. Some “open” (I’ve now realised open can have two meanings, I am only referring to tourneys that can be played by any gender, not the opposite of invite based) tourneys even make a point to request the female world champ participate.

            I’ve written lots about this in the past, but don’t have much time now