Let’s start with Zaslav.

  • Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Text BLOOD to (555)555-5555 if you want to see blood in the water before the billionaire is thrown in. One drop of blood for every 100,000 texts!

  • mommykink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to see Kevin O’Leary (not a billionaire) thrown in before Mark Cuban (an actual billionaire)

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once the novelty has worn off:

    The Bullpen

    It’s the exact same show, except with an angry bull in a pen.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry, I’m imagining we go through a table in an episode, maybe 6-8 people. I’m imagining a single, poignant season. But who knows, we might be able to unearth enough leeches for a season 2 or 3; I have no idea how many billionaires are just bleeding the world dry silently.

      • 3laws@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Trust me we can do 100* seasons, 8 ep each, 4 billionaires per ep with a backstory of their crimes against humanity and the well being of society.

        • qarbone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Mmm, I’m in only if we film all the set footage upfront and leave the backstory documentary to be put together in post. We’ll just use holograms if the investigative host needs to converse with them.

  • Bob@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never understood why it’s called Shark Tank. The UK one is called Dragon’s Den, and to me it makes sense, because dragons hoard gold, but sharks don’t do anything like that as far as I know.

    • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You and your business are bait for the “Sharks” to see who is willing to take a bite first, often causing competition. Probably based on divers using shark cages than swimming in an aquarium but “Shark Cage” doesn’t hit the same and is likely copyrighted

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s derived from the word shark as business jargon, typically used to refer to a stingy yet wealthy investor who will require some extra convincing in order to go along with an idea.

      Part of the: “Jaws is more prominent in pop culture than actual shark facts” bullshit that keep people thinking that sharks are the embodiment of evil.

      Which is why going in front of such investors has been referred to in the business World as, swimming with the sharks.

      Personally I like the Dragon’s Den name better but I see why it wouldn’t fly in america. The name sounds quite mystical and could easily be mistaken for a martial arts program or Eastern fantasy flick.

      That and Americans tend to see billionaires and millionaires in a positive light, often prayed around as examples of the kind of people you should aspire to be. The kind of evil associated with sharks is more of a primal hunger that needs to be satiated (so “cool evil”), whereas dragons or more intentional and calculated kind of evil. (So “bad evil”)

      Admittedly as the buying power of the dollar decreases and we see more and more how countries outside of America tend to do astronomically better in terms of health care affordability and labor rights, the image of billionaires as the upper crust, the creme de La Creme…

      Has definitely shifted a bit say the very least.

      I mean if you want proof of that just look at what popular opinion of Donald Trump was in the 90s compared to today.

      Back in the 90s he was the definition of corporate cool. Cameo appearances of the Donald in things like Pizza Hut commercials and several pieces of film media such as Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, Home Alone 2, and a little known Bo Derrick comedy called Ghosts Can’t Do it…

      Were typically seen as positive and the idea of Donald Trump running for president was taken about as seriously as the idea of Oprah Winfrey running for president.

      Nowadays, he may be the most hated man in America.

  • nxfsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    First you need someone rich enough to fund the aquarium, maybe some multi-multi-millionaire?

      • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or a poker-like game where they raise funds one after another before it’s time to open cards and drop the loser into the tank on a livestream. Would it be hard to lure Elon in? Would he find a way to talk himself out?

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Ummm… sharks don’t eat people. More people die by being hit by coconuts than by sharks.

  • trailing9@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine this would happen and all billionaires are gone. In which world would we live?

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      At this point, we have the series syndicated, and we play it on PBS as an educational reminder of what happens when you don’t share.

      Yes I know cable is dead…

      • trailing9@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s implied. How will the world change? Who prevents the second line in command from grabbing power? How will regular people spend their time?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There would be far less money hoarded, which means more in circulation and a more robust economy. And if the “second line in command” starts hoarding, they can go in the shark tank too.

          • trailing9@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How do you envision the mre robust economy?

            Hoarding on its own shouldn’t be a problem with fiat currencies. The Fed keeps interest rates low until there is some inflation.

            If billionaires keep money in a bank, the bank lents that money to those who spend it.

            If money should be spent more wisely, everybody could spend their income each month more wisely.

            So, what exactly do you want the billionaires to do?

          • MagicFactory@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you’re nuts. Killing the rich isn’t going to make your life better because someone will always replace them. You will never see a cent of wealth that way unless you remove a lot more than just “the rich”.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Anyone who replaces them can go in the shark tank too. Then we take all of their money and start giving everyone a universal basic income.

            • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The issue isn’t that rich people exist they are hoarding and I’ve seen him out of wealth, causing Millennials and gen Z to have a lower quality of life than their parents

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why second episode? There’s plenty of time for more than one per episode. I mean we wouldn’t want to run out so fast the season would be over too soon, but on the other hand, yes we would.