I rewatched an old but good video on the war on drugs. And it reminded me, that tlaw enforcement is AT BEST 1 step ahead of some criminals. But that the criminal element is always rapidly adapting, and the best thing we can do against drugs and crime is to focus on the demand side.

We legalized the drugs, but didn’t do the more important half of that solution, treatment and services for the drug users.

So, why aren’t we doing more? Who dropped the ball? Are we doomed to just keep throwing more law enforcement at the problem?

  • NightAuthor@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
    41·
    1 year ago
    1. We’re on the same page about the war on drugs being a sham from the beginning.
    2. I’m aware of all of that. Not sure what you’re trying to say with that statement.
    3. I’ve been here for 5 months, I’m still getting a lay of the land in many respects, and especially with regard to how I can go about helping the community.
      3.1 Why aren't you doing more? I don’t know where my time/energy/money is going to have reasonable impact. Part of the reason for this post was to seek out information and encourage discussion.
      3.2 volunteer I think getting involved with Code for PDX is a reasonable first step for a developer new to the area.
      3.3 educate I’m more of a computer person, so… here I am. I haven’t come across any research papers on how to stop drug use in Portland Oregon, but I’ll direct my future readings based on what I can learn about the Portland specific issues.

    Not sure how I was being inflammatory, I was just stating some things that I believe to be true, and asking questions about Portland’s struggles. Theres lot of evidence that criminalization and law enforcement aren’t effective ways of dealing with drug problems. And theres evidence that decriminalization can work, when paired with sufficient services and harm reduction.

    So, based on what I know (and feel free to correct, or further enlighten me), it seems clear that more needs to be done in the way of harm reduction and services for those with drug problems. But this city really seems to care, to want to do good things… so I ask why aren’t we doing more. What is the reason that the services aren’t there?

    Maybe there’s something I can do that will make an impact. If more volunteers are needed, then I’ll volunteer. If policy just isn’t where it needs to be, i’ll advocate, or hell maybe run for office.

    This is a way in which I engage with my community. And I am not terrified, nor republican, nor a stooge. I’m not even sure how you came to the conclusion that I’m republican. I’m hoping that we don’t keep trying to solve this problem with law enforcement (Like Kotek is focusing on right now) and instead focus more on the treatment of the drug users (which seems like an afterthought from what I can tell)

    • Piecemakers@lemmy.worldEnglish
      13·
      1 year ago

      I rewatched an old but good video on the war on drugs.

      It’s not “good”, it’s rife with insinuation, mischaracterization, and propaganda. It did not age well.

      And it reminded me… the best thing we can do against drugs and crime is to focus on the demand side.

      According to what authority/study, exactly?

      We legalized the drugs, but didn’t do the more important half of that solution, treatment and services for the drug users.

      Citation needed.

      So, why aren’t we doing more?

      Who is “we” and when did you acquire the finger-pointing position?

      Who dropped the ball?

      Unsupported insinuation.

      Are we doomed to just keep throwing more law enforcement at the problem?

      “Doomed”? Really? And, no one “throws” police at any problem around here that the pigs don’t want to be “legally” beating the shit out of/shooting at already. See: aforementioned interview.

      Downvote all you want, neighbors. Get out there and DO something instead of whinging online.