• intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    4 days ago

    The reason for avoiding pasteurization is to maintain nutrients.

    It’s got nothing to do with whatever ethic might require a person to purposefully invite infection, as this post seems to presuppose.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, it’s just ignorance. Plus if it DID destroying nutrients in any meaningful sense, you would still get more nutrients because you wouldn’t be having constants diarrhea due to drinking raw milk.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      So what scientific experiments have you conducted to come to this conclusion? Obviously, you can never trust a real scientist, right? So you must have done SOMETHING to come to this conclusion all on your own.

      So tell me your methods. I’d love to see your groundbreaking findings, since you’re the smartest person in the world and no one will ever be able to trump your science.

    • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Isn’t pasteurization just heating it up to kill the bacteria? I don’t remember all the details but it’s like not eating raw chicken or something similar.