Mr. Musk may have successfully pushed Twitter's new name and logo, 'X', and even made the vanity domain x.com redirect to the social media website, but that's not to say, the Mathematical double-struck letter will fit the bill everywhere. Apple's App Store can't accept Twitter iOS app's new name due to minimum character requirements
      • Em Adespoton@lemmy.caEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        Ah, but how do you trademark a Monotype capital X when the glyph already has design protection and is part of Unicode?

        They’re taking someone else’s creation and saying “when used in this trade context, it can only belong to us.”

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          1·
          1 year ago

          Ah, but how do you trademark a Monotype capital X when the glyph already has design protection and is part of Unicode?

          You do it the same way everyone else trademarks stuff? I don’t see how using an existing font for the logo or the fact that it’s in Unicode makes any difference here. A logo just has to be distinctive compared to other existing trademarks, it can be made from elements that are common in other contexts.

          For example, Mastercard’s logo is just a red and a yellow circle overlapping each other. Colored circles are nothing new or unusual.

          They’re taking someone else’s creation and saying “when used in this trade context, it can only belong to us.”

          Yes. That’s how trademarks work. It’s exactly what they’re for.

          The thing that’s the stumbling block for Twitter’s rebranding is that “X” has already been trademarked by other companies, including in the context of social media. Not that it’s in Unicode.

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
        12·
        1 year ago

        Ah, I didn’t know the difference between a trademark and a copyright, it makes sense. I remember the case where Intel wanted to copyright the name of one of its old processors and they lost because they were a bunch of numbers so I thought it was comparable.