• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Or… realizing that it’s possible to limit the damage and taking action to make that happen. It’s pretty clear that the article recognizes that it’s possible.

    • Empiricism@sustainability.masto.host
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @silence7

      It’s actually as possible as - the majority of people understanding how to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (AKA not burning fossil fuels, not eating meat - NOT greenwashed) & wanting to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (in a democracy, that should do the “trick”)

      One person could only choose to reduce a tiny fraction of their direct or indirect greenhouse gases. Billions could choose to reduce a massive amount of greenhouse gases.

      It’s as “easy” as informed cooperation & will. But