• Bananigans@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is getting reposted everywhere even though people in the comments are constantly giving the correct information on why this happened. Just giving you a heads-up so you’re not to quick to tie your vote to someone else’s willful misunderstanding of the separation of powers.

    • MishMash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand.

      • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn’t do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

        • prd@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sounds like you a passionate about the topic, do some more reading do you can understand.

          • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you can’t tell me what’s forcing the president to do this? What repercussions he’d face and from where?

            • prd@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Don’t be lazy, if you care so much look it up. The other poster already explained it for you and you chose not to believe it.

            • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              “President” is not “King”

              Money is controlled by Republican Congress.

              Republican Congress is not controlled by Democrat President.

          • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Cool. You feel better now that you’ve joined late and got a meaningless jab in? Got that dopamine hit?

        • sik0fewl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not defending it, since I’m not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he’s done it.