Hydrogen has long been hyped as the “Swiss army knife” of the energy transition, but today – despite billions in investment – it largely remains limited to niche industrial applications.

In a new review article, published in Nature Reviews Clean Technology, we look at where hydrogen could plausibly become competitive – and the applications where it is unlikely to ever be a viable solution.

For each use case, the review looks at the cost and carbon emissions of using hydrogen relative to alternative solutions, identifying the barriers which stand in the way of uptake.

For example, high-profile applications, such as home heating and fuelling cars, are still widely promoted, but are failing to take off.

Fundamentally, this is because hydrogen is an inefficient and costly option in these cases, with Ferraris globally outselling all makes of hydrogen fuel-cell cars combined.

Finally, the review looks at the current state of government hydrogen policy around the world, plus the ways that its potential could be maximised in the future.

  • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hey guys, got this really great idea. We generate a lot of electricity, and then we use that to make compressed hydrogen, and then we use that for our cars. Also we need to figure out how to warehouse it for fueling, and how to transfer it, and how to store it effectively once it’s in the car, but once we get through ALL of that then we’ll finally have a hydrogen powered future and we can…. Wait we could just put the electricity from the first step into the car and eliminate the rest?

    /s