Let’s look on the bright side. The people voted this way (quite significantly) so they must be seeing something positive there. I already know all the downsides so let’s discuss the upsides.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be nice if he had any evidence whatsoever to back it up, but nobody in this thread seems to have any evidence behind them.

      The closest anyone has come is some very tenuous evidence that long prison sentences don’t serve as a deterrent, which ignores the fact that it does keep offenders away from the general public for as long as possible.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Once again, you conveniently ignore the fact that, while prison may not have a dramatic effect on recidivism rates, something that evidence from other commenters contradicts, there is the little fact that offenders can’t commit these acts from behind bars.

          At worst, it puts the damage they do to society on pause for a while.

          • Rangelus@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The evidence does not contradict it, but regardless.

            I agreed with this point elsewhere. Locking a violent criminal up removes them from society, absolutely.

            What I’m arguing against is the idea that perceived harsher punishments will affect the crime rate. I think, on balance of available data, that there is no clear evidence that it will. It will cost taxpayers more money for no tangible benefit.