• lol3droflxp@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see a lot of Dunning Kruger here as well. The fact is that you can generate novel images/texts/whatever with these tools. They may mostly suck but they’re still novel so they can be copyrighted by whoever used these tools to create them.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Even if I grant your premise that their produce is novel – I don’t, that is fundamentally not how they work – the copyright would be held by the bot in that case, not the person who used it.

      No more than a person who commissions a painting has copyright for the work. That’s not how creativity, LLMs, nor copyright law works.