• Soggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    If the allowed amount was “literally none” then the cost of adherence and monitoring would make milk too expensive to produce or it would be poorly enforced and nothing would be different. The same is true for insect parts, rat hair, and other contaminents in literally all processed food. Perfect cleanliness simply isn’t possible, and you’ll never notice anyway.

    • XRchiver@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This. This is why there’s an episode of Bob’s Burgers about their daughter lying at school about the funeral parlor next to the burger shop and her dad’s food having corpses in it and the FDA investigating the restaurant because it potentially had more than 0.4% (?) of human flesh content. Why any at all? At such a small amount it’s impossible to detect, completely safe to consume, and would be well less than a single finger in literal tons of hamburger. It’s gross, but you’ll be fine just like you have so far.

      That, and farmers have to drink milk too; if there was pus in the milk, they’d care enough to do better, and they do because that’s why we give cows antibiotics sometimes.

      Now, if the government decides to loosen all those regulations, THEN I’ll be worried.

      • great_site_not@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        the FDA investigating the restaurant because it potentially had more than 0.4% (?) of human flesh content. Why any at all? At such a small amount it’s impossible to detect, completely safe to consume, and would be well less than a single finger in literal tons of hamburger

        Not to actually argue against your point (nor to conflate this cartoon scenario with real-life regulations), but 0.4% would be way more than just one human finger in literal tons of hamburger. 0.4% of one ton would be 8 pounds / ~4 kilograms. I don’t know how many human fingers that is, but I’m certain it’s significantly more than one.

        • XRchiver@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Okay, to be fair, I can’t math. Sorry about that. Just curious, how much is 0.4% in, say, a pound?

          Never mind, I guess I’ve got a smartphone for a reason. “6.4 ounces”. Thanks for correcting me. :)

          • Kryptenx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            That just calculated 16oz*.4 but should be *.004 for .4% so it’s actually 0.064oz/lb, or 1.8grams/lb. 1 in 250 particles.