A judge in New York rejected a request by attorneys for Fox News to subpoena billionaire George Soros as part of the cable news channelā€™s ongoing legal fight with voting systems company Smartmatic.

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice David B. Cohen on Monday shot down a request from Fox to compel Soros to provide documents and testimony as part of its process of discovery in the case.

Soros is a progressive billionaire who often draws the ire of conservative media figures and Republican politicians.

Fox, in a court filing earlier this month, sought to depose Mark Malloch Brown, who is the president of the Soros-backed Open Society Foundation and served as chairman of Smartmaticā€™s parent company.

ā€œI base that on the finding that the crux of Smartmaticā€™s claims is that Fox has asserted they were part of rigging [the election], not that Smartmatic was affiliated with George Soros, Alex Soros, or the OSF,ā€ Cohen said in open court on Monday, CNN reported. ā€œThatā€™s a peripheral matter ā€” at best, itā€™s a possible rationale for defamation.ā€

  • Orbituary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    I agree with the decision. I take exception at calling ANY billionaire ā€œprogressive.ā€ The author is bent.

    • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      I broadly agree, but Soros probably puts more money towards progressive causes than any other human being.

      He shouldnā€™t be able to, because billionaires shouldnā€™t exist. We shouldnā€™t have to depend on the goodwill of an oligarch to fund progressive causes.

      That said, Fox hates him for a reason.

      • chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        Fox hates him because Rupert Murdoch spent a shitload of time and effort to artificially boost the Pound Sterling in 1992 as the Tories were fucking things up.

        Soros bet against the Tories, publicly so, and made over a billion on Black Wednesday alone.

        The Tories lost the next election in a landslide (five years later) and didnā€™t return to power until 2010.

        September 1992 marks the beginning of Murdochā€™s hatred of Soros.

      • Orbituary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        No billionaires are innocent. Iā€™m a longtime secular humanist and feel that my values espouse progressive ideology. Soros might fund entities that push left-leaning ideals, but not without their own agendas. I rankle at the idea that anybody with billions of dollars didnā€™t step on necks to get where they gotā€¦ and that alone is enough to laugh when someone says heā€™s defending the common man.

        He wouldnā€™t know struggle if it cried to him at his feet. Billionaires should not be defended.

        That being said, heā€™s Foxā€™s most favored boogeyman. They love to blame everything on him. I would be surprised if 1/10 things they blame on him are his doing. Murdoch is the ant-Soros and theyā€™re in a wrinkly billionaire supervillain fight. Weā€™re all casualties.