Most postings on lemmy are simply Reddit “archive” bots. Why is this so prevalent?

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because people think “content” is what makes this kind of site great. In reality it’s discussion.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, it’s both. There is no discussion without content, so having some content helps to kickstart discussion. But excessive botspam just makes it look even emptier.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes you need content, but without the discussion the content is just a firehose of random garbage.

        • eee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          …and without content, there isn’t any discussion to start with.

          like i said, i agree that healthy discussion is the best, but we need something to kickstart it.

  • Master@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If anything is going to kill lemmy it will be these low effort content bots. Just post after post of either reddit reposts no one is replying to or random news links no one is replying to. When I scroll lemmy at night before bed 90% of the content is garbage with no comments posted to it.

    It makes me want to go back to reddit in spite of it all.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmit is a scourge. They claim to be trying to “bootstrap” Lemmy by providing content but so much of it is questions with no responses (on Lemmy) or Imgur links to deleted images.

    • Millie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I honestly wish the major instances would ban repost bots. We don’t need to literally copy Reddit to Lemmy. It’s just polluting it.

  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’re trying to build communities. A good way to do it is to have bots post content, so there’s stuff to see on our feeds.

    It’s always a balancing act that doesn’t work for everybody. But the beauty here is that each individual can curate their own feed.

    Edit: I misspoke, I’m not someone who actively uses of promotes bot use. I just remember people talking about this discussion previously and this was a justification used. OP asked a question, I provided an answer. It’s not MY answer, but it’s still one. Don’t shoot the messenger.

      • Decoy321@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s entirely understandable. That’s the thing, though. It’s hard to have a community grow on its own, organically, in these times. A large majority of users are rather passive, they don’t actively contribute by posting or commenting so much. If they don’t get enough content on a topic/community, they’ll forget it exists.

        So, to build a community, you get a bot to “seed” it with content until enough people know it exists and contribute stuff themselves.

        It’s weird and fucked and, unfortunately, it’s the world we live in now.

        • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree, it just leads to spam and people blocking the bots, and therefore the communities. I think things will grow organically at whatever speed. People have to realise this isn’t Reddit, and likely won’t ever be as big, and that it’s good that it won’t be.