and no one irl even has the decency to agree with me because it’s so fucking drilled into the culture that these fucking BuNsInNesSes have a Right to do this because it’s a bSUsniEss. like oh yeah they have an office building so they definitely get to analyze my piss because they say they want to. sick fucking freaks.

preaching to the choir a bit on lemmy (or i would hope so at least) but still

  • PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    An employer is not a therapist. No small business owner should have to play guidance counselor for their employees.

    • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This was more common back in the days, but the issue is that it will result in societal inefficiencies like alcoholics not getting better. Best is nipping it before it gets a lot worse.

      This is why in other countries there are a lot of responsibilities as an employer and they need to help with either private or public healthcare.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m going to guess that the “other countries” you mentioned also have functional and affordable health care systems?

        • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, my point was that it can be good for society to burden eachother too. Especially where we’re supposed to earn our daily living, look out for people

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Give me a functional healthcare system and I’m down with assigning companies more responsibility.

            • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              In Sweden the responsibility comes first, the company are liable for the employee if they don’t take action and know about the substance abuse (for example). And I think the US at least had some laws prohibiting like that, but maybe I’m thinking of wrongful termination

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I appreciate my employers policy - you get one free pass if you attend therapy following a positive drug test. A second positive and you’re out.

        We do randomly get tested regularly.

      • Subverb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t drug test at my business, but if two of my long-term employees come to HR and flat-out tell me that another of their recently-hired coworkers is smoking at breaks and at lunch my hands are legally pretty tied.

        I can’t ignore it.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are there criminal charges following a drug test?

        No.

        Bad example.

        If negative drug tests are a condition for employment, you’ve agreed to them as part of employment. Being let go because you broke a condition for employment is on you.

        You are welcome to find jobs where there are no drug tests, or start your own company with that ethos in mind.