Section 91 states that a pedestrian ‘shall not proceed onto a roadway … into the path of any vehicle that is so close that it is impracticable for the driver of the vehicle to yield the right of way’
At crosswalks, drivers can go once the pedestrian is clear of the vehicle; otherwise, they may face a $300 fine (doubled in community safety zones) and three demerit points.
Careful. In Ottawa you’re risking a fine. Their rules - and it varies by region - is that the pedestrian needs to be out of the crosswalk completely, and not just clear of the vehicle, before the car can continue.
This, as you can imagine, is always a bit of a surprise where it’s in place – especially in Ottawa where they tend to honk if they think you’ve had the chance to go and waited more than 5 milliseconds.
Edmonton has a ton of crosswalks across 60kph roads, with flashing lights that indicate drivers must slow down to 35kph (and obviously stop if there’s a pedestrian in the cross walk).
The problem is a lot of cyclists don’t bother to hit the button, then just keep barreling straight on through.
They might have different laws in Ontario but in BC that’s also the way to do it.
If they’re on the bike they’re considered a vehicle and have to cross the road in the same way a car would*.
If they’re walking the bike they’re treated as a pedestrian and must walk across the crosswalk
*( There are exceptions, such as multi use trails, but they are either clearly marked to both the road and trail users or they have a stop sign for cyclists)
The problem is a lot of cyclists don’t bother to hit the button, then just keep barreling straight on through.
So they should be expected to stop the bike, get off of it, go push a button, then go back to the bike at every single intersection? Maybe the “problem” is this horrible, cyclist-unfriendly crosswalk design.
You know, you are right. Since pressing beg buttons is not such an inconvenience, why don’t we make car drivers press them instead and let pedestrians continue unimpeded like cars do today?
What you’re remembering is reasonable because you were a kid and probably biking on a sidewalk, which is generally not what commuting cyclists use. I (and perhaps @frostbiker) are thinking of a crossover at a multi-use trail which are designed for cyclists to commute along.
Surely if you want people to drive less (which is a good thing for all commuters, especially those who drive!) then wouldn’t it behoove municipalities to design infrastructure that’s conducive to efficiently cycling, right? To me, having to stop at every single road crossing is incredibly discouraging. Can you imagine if every light on your commute was red?
Surely if you want people to drive less (which is a good thing for all commuters, especially those who drive!) then wouldn’t it behoove municipalities to design infrastructure that’s conducive to efficiently cycling, right?
And there is, except in cases where it isn’t. In cases where it isn’t, it’s in your best interests to stop and push the button (you don’t need to get off your bike, it’s on a pole).
To me, having to stop at every single road crossing is incredibly discouraging.
The alternative is expecting a vehicle doing 60km/s to stop on a dime. I don’t want to hit a cyclist, but jesus it’s like some of them go out of their way to avoid safety measures.
Can you imagine if every light on your commute was red?
Can you imagine if cars treated every red light like it was a yield?
In my experience as a driver, pedestrian, and cyclist, is that good cycling infrastructure is the exception, not the rule. Do you really think we generally have good cycling infrastructure in Canada?
The alternative is expecting a vehicle doing 60km/s to stop on a dime.
That’s a false dichotomy. What if drivers were simply required to slow to a crawl (yield) at certain intersections, rather than cyclists having to completely stop to press a button, and then wait for the light to change?
Can you imagine if cars treated every red light like it was a yield?
Yes, I can, because that’s how most drivers treat stop signs. I don’t like generalizing drivers or cyclists, but “jesus it’s like some of them go out of their way to avoid safety measures” could apply to all types of road users. Heck, just ten minutes ago on the drive home from the gym, some idiot in a car pulled out in front of me from a drive, into a busy, snow-covered street at the bottom of an overpass and I had to brake heavily to avoid turning his passenger side door into a modern art sculpture.
I don’t like generalizing drivers or cyclists, but “jesus it’s like some of them go out of their way to avoid safety measures” could apply to all types of road users.
Neither do I, but I’m not advocating for treating red lights/stop signs as yields, nor am I complaining about how stopping at them is a major inconvenience for me.
That’s a 60kph zone with a bend and a tree line that can make cyclists hard to see when they don’t feel like stopping. You’re perfectly entitled to feel that stopping to push the button is inconvenient, but you can’t turn around and complain about the number of cyclists hit by cars each year when they willingly avoid safety precautions.
Why do you present a false dichotomy again, this time between cyclists crossing a dangerous road without stopping, or coming to a complete stop? I can think of at least two or three other solutions off the top of my head:
Lower the speed limit of the road and improve visibility so that commuters can see one another.
Place a yield sign so that drivers are legally required to slow to a speed at which they could safely stop if necessary.
Build an overpass or an underpass so that the lanes don’t cross on the same plane.
If we can agree that the current infrastructure is suboptimal, let’s focus on improving the infrastructure rather than assigning blame. Improving the infrastructure helps all road users.
Careful. In Ottawa you’re risking a fine. Their rules - and it varies by region - is that the pedestrian needs to be out of the crosswalk completely, and not just clear of the vehicle, before the car can continue.
This, as you can imagine, is always a bit of a surprise where it’s in place – especially in Ottawa where they tend to honk if they think you’ve had the chance to go and waited more than 5 milliseconds.
Edmonton has a ton of crosswalks across 60kph roads, with flashing lights that indicate drivers must slow down to 35kph (and obviously stop if there’s a pedestrian in the cross walk).
The problem is a lot of cyclists don’t bother to hit the button, then just keep barreling straight on through.
They might have different laws in Ontario but in BC that’s also the way to do it.
If they’re on the bike they’re considered a vehicle and have to cross the road in the same way a car would*.
If they’re walking the bike they’re treated as a pedestrian and must walk across the crosswalk
*( There are exceptions, such as multi use trails, but they are either clearly marked to both the road and trail users or they have a stop sign for cyclists)
So they should be expected to stop the bike, get off of it, go push a button, then go back to the bike at every single intersection? Maybe the “problem” is this horrible, cyclist-unfriendly crosswalk design.
When I was a kid, we were taught to get off our bike and walk it across the street. Jesus Christ you sound like an entitled twat.
You know, you are right. Since pressing beg buttons is not such an inconvenience, why don’t we make car drivers press them instead and let pedestrians continue unimpeded like cars do today?
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
I’ll take a shot at de-escalating this thread…
What you’re remembering is reasonable because you were a kid and probably biking on a sidewalk, which is generally not what commuting cyclists use. I (and perhaps @frostbiker) are thinking of a crossover at a multi-use trail which are designed for cyclists to commute along.
Surely if you want people to drive less (which is a good thing for all commuters, especially those who drive!) then wouldn’t it behoove municipalities to design infrastructure that’s conducive to efficiently cycling, right? To me, having to stop at every single road crossing is incredibly discouraging. Can you imagine if every light on your commute was red?
And there is, except in cases where it isn’t. In cases where it isn’t, it’s in your best interests to stop and push the button (you don’t need to get off your bike, it’s on a pole).
The alternative is expecting a vehicle doing 60km/s to stop on a dime. I don’t want to hit a cyclist, but jesus it’s like some of them go out of their way to avoid safety measures.
Can you imagine if cars treated every red light like it was a yield?
In my experience as a driver, pedestrian, and cyclist, is that good cycling infrastructure is the exception, not the rule. Do you really think we generally have good cycling infrastructure in Canada?
That’s a false dichotomy. What if drivers were simply required to slow to a crawl (yield) at certain intersections, rather than cyclists having to completely stop to press a button, and then wait for the light to change?
Yes, I can, because that’s how most drivers treat stop signs. I don’t like generalizing drivers or cyclists, but “jesus it’s like some of them go out of their way to avoid safety measures” could apply to all types of road users. Heck, just ten minutes ago on the drive home from the gym, some idiot in a car pulled out in front of me from a drive, into a busy, snow-covered street at the bottom of an overpass and I had to brake heavily to avoid turning his passenger side door into a modern art sculpture.
Neither do I, but I’m not advocating for treating red lights/stop signs as yields, nor am I complaining about how stopping at them is a major inconvenience for me.
For reference, this is the crosswalk I’m talking about: https://maps.app.goo.gl/BfiysRy4uVC511zFA
That’s a 60kph zone with a bend and a tree line that can make cyclists hard to see when they don’t feel like stopping. You’re perfectly entitled to feel that stopping to push the button is inconvenient, but you can’t turn around and complain about the number of cyclists hit by cars each year when they willingly avoid safety precautions.
Why do you present a false dichotomy again, this time between cyclists crossing a dangerous road without stopping, or coming to a complete stop? I can think of at least two or three other solutions off the top of my head:
Lower the speed limit of the road and improve visibility so that commuters can see one another.
Place a yield sign so that drivers are legally required to slow to a speed at which they could safely stop if necessary.
Build an overpass or an underpass so that the lanes don’t cross on the same plane.
If we can agree that the current infrastructure is suboptimal, let’s focus on improving the infrastructure rather than assigning blame. Improving the infrastructure helps all road users.