• Stamets@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What was wrong with that game?

    Daniel Craig.

    It was a Brosnan movie and Brosnan game. It angered me to hell they had the nerve to already refuse to honor their promise with Brosnan (He was supposed to make more Bond movies) and then take away something that was his and give it to him. There was no even asking of Brosnan either. They just made it Craig.

    • Zoolander@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, it was a James Bond movie and a James Bond game. Craig was the current Bond. You’re confusing business decisions with whether or not the game was good. It was. It wasn’t an abomination.

      • Stamets@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No. It was a BROSNAN movie and a BROSNAN game. Your point doesn’t hold up remotely given every Bond has had their own extremely distinct vibes and that according to bond lore, Craig wasn’t even a 00 during the events of Goldeneye. When you compare the Brosnan bond to Craig’s bond in that game they’re not even remotely similar.

        The game was an abomination.

        Not continuing this.

        • Zoolander@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Brosnan was an actor. He was paid to play a character. James Bond is a character. He has been played by many different actors. It’s not like they just took the old GoldenEye and slapped Craig’s face on it. You’re being ridiculous. It was a great game.