For those who couldn’t read the Linux GUI:

  • Windows used 3.4 GB / 8GB
  • Linux used 800 MB/ 8 GB
  • Krtek@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t get why this is always mentioned. Windows caches too and uses up all free space for faster application startup, but just because it also does it doesn’t change the fact that it uses more ram for active processes while doing nothing. I remember Minecraft running a lot better on my old MacBook with just 4gb of ram as Ubuntu used less than Mac OS X and I could allocate more to the game, whether cacheing was enabled or not on those OSes was not relevant. This should not be relevant today as 32gb of ram can be purchased for less than 100 bucks but sadly is as Apple and other laptop manufacturers think selling soldered 8gb is ok for a base model in 2023 for a laptop costing more than 300 bucks

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ve never owned a laptop that didn’t have upgradeable RAM.

      I also don’t pay for Apple products so that might be why. Vote with your wallets and stop buying their overpriced metal bullshit.

      • Krtek@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The ancient MacBook in question has a firmware limitation and thus only supports 4gb, it was already upgraded from 2gb iirc (black 2007 MacBook 3,1). My current laptop has 16gb soldered, too bad that the hinge will die again before the ram becomes insufficient

          • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m still using my 2014 MBP as a daily driver. They’re surprisingly long lasting. Only thing I’m rolling with still that’s older is a Lenovo X220 that I use to play a starship bridge simulator with haha.