Or maybe they will launch Win 12 with optional TPM support.

Imho making the OS(es) TPM only cannot be good for their business, many people are still on Win 10 with no intention to switch, since their motheboard does not support TPM and do not want to upgrade PC / waste PCI-E slot on TPM extension.

  • ceiphas@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Problem is, i havent enabled my TPM and don’t plan to, either.

    TPM just gives your PC a non-spoofable fingerprint so Microsoft can always identify your PC. It’s simply a DRM-device built into your PC.

    • Blaster M@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Your PC is already identifiable by the license key, the hardware installed, and you signing in with a Microsoft Account. If you’re that worried about gummint tracking or something, you shouldn’t even be gaming on your PC, as games and game stores have a lot of data to leak about you and what you’re doing on the PC.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        i don’t sign-in to my systems with a microsoft account. hell, i don’t even have one. nowadays, i dunno if i could even get one–and maintain it, as i do not have, nor want, an sms-capable or ‘smart’ phone. they don’t do ‘verification’ bullshit by voice anymore, just sms.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just because you haven’t enabled it doesn’t mean it’s not available. If you want a modern operating system, that’s the “you must be this tall to ride this ride.”

      • ceiphas@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        You mean a massively patched windows 2000 with modern OS? Does Linux count, or BSD? How about macOS?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 months ago

          Linux if you’re prepared to support it entirely yourself and still have functional issues.

          MacOS if you want to pay 3x the price for hardware that’s 1/2 as capable and has locked you out of modifications.

          • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Linux if you’re prepared to support it entirely yourself

            What does this even mean? The most work caused in administering my company’s IT comes from destructive patches from Microsoft. Just like a month ago they released a security patch that caused the domain controller to not reboot which is pretty much the worst thing you can run into aside outright malicious actors (not sure Microsoft doesn’t count as one). So I had to “support” users by rolling back untested shit until a hotfix was released.

            My private setup runs exclusively on Linux. Patches also sometimes cause trouble but it’s just as infrequent and less destructive if it happens.

            It’s really not that different from an admin point of view but it’s not Linux’ business model to snoop on or extort you or to force proprietary hardware on you because sEcUrItY.

            • Blaster M@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 months ago

              Two days ago I spent the whole day rebuilding a linux server because an update ate the system. This is not a Microsoft specific issue.

              • Oisteink@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                11 months ago

                Just nobody talks about that - it’s all wonderful in the land of Linux. A breeze managing 600+ laptops used by non-it-literate execs. No error all the time!

              • wmassingham@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                My favorite is when the sssd package maintainers don’t properly update their dependencies, so when some of the packages get updated, they don’t pull in others, and then I’m not able to log in with my external account.

            • r00ty@kbin.life
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Here’s what I’m going to say here. With Windows it’s very easy to make it a very slow running/system with problems. But, it’s generally quite hard to entirely break it such that you cannot get to the GUI and attempt to fix it.

              With Linux, just updating will sometimes break the system to the extent that if you’re lucky it will boot to a terminal. I’m experienced with linux (since the 1990s) and I’ve had linux systems that took my a better part of a day to fix. Someone that just wants to turn it on and work is going to be lost trying to fix this kind of thing.

              Ubuntu upgrades from one release to another are extremely hit and miss in my experience and again if you don’t know how to pick up a failed upgrade and complete it, then fix the broken dependencies, fix the upgraded stuff that doesn’t like your old config files, etc etc. You’re going to be in trouble.

              Linux is objectively better in every way except when it goes wrong. This is one of the reasons normal users won’t adopt it en-masse.

              • the_weez@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                Windows upgrades from one version to the other are also a hot mess, so I don’t think that’s a knock against Linux. I just think everyone sucks at in place upgrades, maybe not Mac but I have little experience there.

                I’d much rather reinstall windows fresh than upgrade a 7 machine to 10 to be on a supported OS. Going from 10 to 11 uninstalled most of my apps and still resulted in a janky system.

                Rolling distros don’t have this same problem because there aren’t really versions but they have a whole bunch of new and different problems. I still prefer rolling for personal systems though.

                • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Mac has its problems too. Apparently there was an issue with upgrading to macOS Sonoma or booting Asahi Linux on certain MacBooks if ProMotion was disabled or something like that, which essentially “bricked” the laptop.

                  All operating systems have their odd bugs and snags.