• Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly the PS Portal seems extremely expensive for a remote play only device. I feel like the Deck is a much better value proposition with it being able to play games on it’s own and work away from your home network.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I agree it is. That said. This isn’t an even match, and they are sold as two different use cases. One is a full on computer, the other is literally just a single purpose thin client “portal.”

      You should consider any bells and whistles that come with a 500+ device, like hdr, showing up on a 200 device a friggin miracle bonus.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        To be fair, the deck can be a lot cheaper than 500+. Comparing a $350 64GB LCD deck to a $200 PS Portal really favors the Deck. Neither device supports HDR at that price, but the Deck can do so much more than the Portal.

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m just gonna drop this comment to say this community seems super disappointing. Just a circle jerk. It’s not a competition between your favorite thing and another thing. It’s okay for some people to spend less for something else.

          I really hate communities that act this way. it’s so weird. And for what.

          • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyzOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Personally I was just really disappointed with the PS Portal pricing, feels priced far too high for what it is. I think stream only devices can be decent, but they need to be priced more competitively.

            • echo64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Shrug, the thing sold out at that price point. It can be “too expensive” and also the right price for the market.

              And honestly, a display, an arm chipset, good wifi, Bluetooth, all the dualsense modules. The cost of production adds up.

              There have been a lot of armchair experts around this thing whinging about it, but people who bought them are super happy. Why rain on that parade? Just be cool about it.

            • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s priced badly but idk if I can call it priced unreasonably because it contains a dualsense controller which is expensive as is.

            • ivanafterall@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m not a PS Portal customer at any price point and I’m a consistent Sony customer. Maybe if they got it down to the $99-$129 range? It just doesn’t make any sense to me given the options out there.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Honestly the PS Portal seems extremely expensive for a remote play only device.

      Compared to what, exactly?

      I feel like the Deck is a much better value

      It absolutely is. It’s also, at minimum, double the price.

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          To be fair that’s the older LCD model, not the OLED the article is discussing, which is 549 minimum