First we need to build the Ai that understands huamn intentions. Then Ai that translates those human intentions to a product. Then an Ai to debug that product when the human decides it doesn’t like it anymore and it really wanted something else all along. Then an Ai to negotiate with the human about how that’s going to require more development time and discovery and will have associated costs. Then another Ai to come in and pretend to have authority so the human feels placated. Then an Ai to demo the new 2.0 product to the human and the Ai stakeholders. And then the Ai stakeholders need to communicate to the Ai shareholders. Who then need to communicate with the Ai stock traders who then tell the humans the product they built isn’t being traded by Ai as well as they predicted so their Ai just lost them all of their money. Then the Human can get sad while it’s Ai music bot plays sad Ai music for the sad human
First we need to build the Ai that understands huamn intentions. Then Ai that translates those human intentions to a product. Then an Ai to debug that product when the human decides it doesn’t like it anymore and it really wanted something else all along. Then an Ai to negotiate with the human about how that’s going to require more development time and discovery and will have associated costs. Then another Ai to come in and pretend to have authority so the human feels placated. Then an Ai to demo the new 2.0 product to the human and the Ai stakeholders. And then the Ai stakeholders need to communicate to the Ai shareholders. Who then need to communicate with the Ai stock traders who then tell the humans the product they built isn’t being traded by Ai as well as they predicted so their Ai just lost them all of their money. Then the Human can get sad while it’s Ai music bot plays sad Ai music for the sad human
I think its sorta inverse: we need a computer programming language made for AIs to interface with, along with CI/CD it can use.