fne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoRepublicans slam broadband discounts for poor people, threaten to kill program | Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square68fedilinkarrow-up1541arrow-down133file-textcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1508arrow-down1external-linkRepublicans slam broadband discounts for poor people, threaten to kill program | Ars Technicaarstechnica.comfne8w2ah@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square68fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: brainworms@lemm.eetechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareCowbee@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·11 months agoCo-ops are cool, but markets in general have far too many disadvantages for me to advocate for market-based Socialism over a non-market solution.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoShort of a complete revolution, market Socialisim is probably the most viable path out of capitalism. It doesn’t have to stay there, and shouldn’t, but it’ll be a whole lot less messy than a revolution.
minus-squareCowbee@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoDepends on the country, honestly. In America, I’m more inclined to believe Syndicalism would work, reform won’t meaningfully happen from within. In general, I’m anti-tendency and believe that the material conditions of each space need to be analyzed independently.
Co-ops are cool, but markets in general have far too many disadvantages for me to advocate for market-based Socialism over a non-market solution.
Short of a complete revolution, market Socialisim is probably the most viable path out of capitalism. It doesn’t have to stay there, and shouldn’t, but it’ll be a whole lot less messy than a revolution.
Depends on the country, honestly. In America, I’m more inclined to believe Syndicalism would work, reform won’t meaningfully happen from within.
In general, I’m anti-tendency and believe that the material conditions of each space need to be analyzed independently.