Rules say reconstructions are allowed but doesn’t specify if illustration counts.

Those are objects from the Roman Empire. About 130 have been found in total.

They are typically made of brass and fit in the hand but can vary from 35 grams to a kilo. Each side has holes of different sizes with rings around them. On each corner you will find a sphere protruding.

But there are three things you won’t find.

  1. you won’t find them in or near the capital. They are found all over the European part of the empire including Britain, but never once in the Near East or African portions of the empire and also never in what we call Italy today.
  2. you won’t find why they exist. There is no known use for them that survives scrutiny. But you will find lots of speculation.
  3. you won’t find any markings. No labeles, no symbols, no gauges, or numbers. Just holes with rings.

Are they part of a mystery colt, some rather expensive game piece, blacksmith training? No one knows.

Find a 3D print file and make one yourself and ponder it for a while. Or draw one. I haven’t found any woodworking plans. Maybe I could fix that.

Micron, A5.

  • PugJesus@piefed.social
    cake
    M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    : 1) was there really much of note that would have been shared by both Germans and Celts of this period?

    Oh, yes, certainly. One of the things often noted in the modern day about Caesar’s Commentarii is that he draws a much ‘stronger’ line between the peoples than actually existed. He might have wanted to contrast the “Noble, civilizable” Celts with the “Barbaric, dangerous” Germanics, or he simply might have been calling matters as he saw them through the ethnographic lens of an ancient Roman. Like most regions before concentrated state institutions, it’s not really a boolean “Celt/Germanic” so much as it is a gradient, with a lot of outliers. Not only that, but “German” is sometimes thought to be a Celtic word meaning, roughly, “neighbor” - the two cultures were geographically close and interacted on a regular basis.

    1. why were these (evidently) only found where Romans had a mixing / fringe presence, and not deeper in to Celt / Germanic territory?

    No clue, I’m afraid!

    • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      …it’s not really a boolean “Celt/Germanic” so much as it is a gradient, with a lot of outliers.

      Thanks for explaining… makes a lot of sense!