• Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I won’t argue about the value of explanation from a lying hallucinating machine.

    But I like how your use case is “it does the things that I believe to be useless and time wasting for everyone involved. But instead of, pushing for the end of these time wasting acts, I waste a little less time with llms (instead of all of the time by not doing these time wasting acts) while still wasting the time of the reader.” What an efficient use case! We should violate IP law, waste drinking water and energy for it!

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The problem is many people liked how it was, it makes more work to do, makes it seem official. I believe in that book bullshit jobs, and think most people are winging it with performative bullshit.

      What I saw recently at my work is people received something that looked like AI slop from the head boss and they laughed about it, which got back to the boss, who then defended himself that it wasn’t AI.

      So I’m hopeful that people are called out for wasting peoples time, and that long winded blobs of meaningless text become a firable offense.