• jj4211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    The risk is what the GOP is threatening to do in Colorado. If Trump isnā€™t allowed on the public voting infrastructure, theyā€™ll just caucus instead.

    In which case, itā€™s likely that independents wonā€™t be allowed to participate.

    So for primaries, itā€™s likely to have the opposite effect, more likely for a Trump candidacy, by stirring up the base and locking out potential moderate voters.

    For general election, Maine and Colorado donā€™t practically matter, they were never going to go to trump anyway. So for these two states, itā€™s ammunition for a persecution complex without good result. For it to be a good strategic win, it would have to be some states that Trump actually has a chance of winning.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      The risk is what the GOP is threatening to do in Colorado. If Trump isnā€™t allowed on the public voting infrastructure, theyā€™ll just caucus instead.

      They have every right to. Again, because a primary isnā€™t an election for office, itā€™s a private entity (in this case the GOP) being allowed to borrow public infrastructure to help them decide who they want to back for the actual election.

      Same reason super delegates for the Dems werenā€™t illegal, even if they were in bad faith.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        10 months ago

        Itā€™s perfectly in their rights, but not what an effort seeking to prevent a Trump candidacy should want.

        • WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          10 months ago

          If the state ruled Trump canā€™t be on the primary ballot because heā€™s ineligible to be president, then he canā€™t be on the main ballot because heā€™s ineligible to be president. That means no Republican will be on the ballot, and thatā€™s really bad for the Republicans.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            10 months ago

            Trump missing from the ballot in Colorado and Maine would not make a difference, they donā€™t vote Republican in the general election anyway.

            Youā€™d need this to happen in a vaguely competitive state. Judging from the progress of various attempts, that doesnā€™t seem likely, unless the supreme Court declared it nationally, but I donā€™t see that happening even if they let Colorado and Maine stand.

            So you have got a bunch of Trump die hards inspired to ā€œfight like hellā€ in the face of what they describe as an injustice, all to block him in a state he wasnā€™t going to win anyway.

            Now if you pulled this off in some place like Georgia, Florida, Texas, then sure, that would be quite the blow and may persuade the GOP voters to really around some other candidate that would be more tolerable. But Colorado and Maine arenā€™t going to really help general election results.