• mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The updates available through Ubuntu Pro wouldn’t have normally been available prior to Pro. It’s an added service, not something that was previously available that is now locked behind a paywall. There are plenty of reasons to not like Canonical but this isn’t one.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s an added service, not something that was previously available that is now locked behind a paywall.

      I didn’t say anything about it having changed, so your “now” is disingenuous. Fact is, update support by Canonical for Universe is locked behind Ubuntu Pro. Non-Ubuntu distributions such as CachyOS/Fedora/Bazzite/openSUSE/Debian/… don’t have this hostile behaviour.

      • mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        They also don’t provide those updates. I am a Fedora guy by the way. I’m not defending Canonical, just pointing out that this is a silly reason to dislike them.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They also don’t provide those updates.

          Fedora allows all updates that do not break compatibility. To update packages in Universe means adhering to overly zealous version number freeze policy, whereas leaf packages in Fedora can be updates without much fuss. I contributed a small number (only two or three) of updates to Fedora packages years ago. Nothing was a core package, only tiny stand-alone utilities, so the stuff that would be in Universe under Ubuntu, but they had new version numbers. Updates were accepted by the maintainers without much trouble.

          I am a Fedora guy by the way.

          So you should know that I’m right.