Apologies, I seem to have missed some discussions on this. It was a little surprising when I came back and saw todcon on the front page even before logging in.

Long story short, I donā€™t think itā€™s a good idea to show NSFW posts to logged out users. The reason would be that some of the NSFW communities and posts are a bit too far out for the average anime fan (who is your likely person that would come across such communities) to be comfortable viewing, and having those posts visible to someone thatā€™s not even logged in (e.g. public) right under the pinned ā€œWeā€™re not what you think we areā€ isnā€™t a great look.

First impressions count, and Iā€™m not sure thatā€™s the best first impression a random person stumbling across here might have.

I understand the original discussion was about getting more members,* but Iā€™m not sure doing this would have that effect. If people arenā€™t comfortable viewing some kinks and fetishes, theyā€™re not going to want to be associated with a community that displays these things so openly. The previous method of ā€œYea, you gotta log in to see the NSFW stuffā€ makes sense, since it gives the user the freedom to block/not receive updates from communities they arenā€™t interested in, or they arenā€™t comfortable viewing. Between that, and the current ā€œJust turn away from this community if you donā€™t like what you see on the front pageā€, the former seems better. Imo those that are interested in such niche NSFW stuff would find it themselves after they make an account to browse.

*For what itā€™s worth, my stance on this would be largely similar to CookieJarObserver - itā€™s alright to have a small community and to just treat this place as a ā€œloli-meme friendly version of Reddit.ā€ Growth may be possible from future migrations resulting from Redditā€™s actions (just like how the original migration occurred and brought the NSFW Touhou subs, along with me, here), so it shouldnā€™t be something thatā€™s chased.

On the other hand, the ā€œNSFW publicly on displayā€ route can result in some that really hate/detest some kink right smack on the front page and immediately coming away with the impression that thatā€™s what the entire Lemmy instance is about. Even if it was just one post that popped up at the wrong timeā€¦ they wouldnā€™t know. If someone doesnā€™t like seeing people die, but they browsed Reddit at a time when r/watchpeopledie had NSFW posts publicly available on the front page, theyā€™re not likely to think ā€œOh, Iā€™ll make an account anyway, find a community I like, and block that subreddit.ā€ Itā€™s more likely theyā€™ll go ā€œWhat the fuckā€ and associate the whole site with what they saw for a few secondsā€¦ just like that, the siteā€™s lost a potential person that couldā€™ve stuck around happily in another community and formed part of the desired broader community even if they didnā€™t likeā€¦ watching people die.

For proposed solutions, Iā€™d like to suggest the following (though some of them are probably already done):

  1. Restrict NSFW communities and posts to registered users.
  2. Have a pinned public post explaining that NSFW communities and posts are restricted to logged-in users, and have a list of what NSFW communities exist (along with a short description, if any). You can also emphasize the fact that users have full freedom to block any communities they donā€™t want appearing in their feed.
  3. Just relax/chill with the current userbase and see if Reddit takes any more actions that cause further migrations. You can advertise about this Lemmy branch/instance in the meantime if you want, but even Reddit didnā€™t quite gain traction until the Digg exodus/migration (among others). Itā€™s not impossible for further growth to come from external factors just like how this came into existence.
  4. For those particularly interested to grow their communities, trying to start discussion posts and getting to know members of your community may help. Weekly discussion threads, seeing whoā€™s alive and bothers to respondā€¦ itā€™s not much, but itā€™s something.

Iā€™ve used todcon as an example above, since I donā€™t particularly care for it, but I want to stress itā€™s less about the content and more about the approach. Others might dislike NSFW loli but theyā€™re alright with NSFW shota, or they might dislike NSFW shota and theyā€™re alright with cub stuff, or they might hate all these, but lurk to see how this place develops (and to bring the banhamma down or call for it, but thatā€™s another matter). In general, most people have stuff they wouldnā€™t like to see, so giving them the freedom to decide if they see it (by making an account and letting them decide what to block) is probably going to go down better than someone coming cross the site and thinking ā€œman that place is a bit too crazy for me, given what they allow on the front pageā€¦ Iā€™m not going back there.ā€

Ultimately, Iā€™d like to suggest that the image of the Lemmy branch should be something along the lines of:

ā€œYes, we allow NSFW loli memes which Reddit used to allow, and which other Lemmy anime communities donā€™t allow. Thatā€™s what differentiates us in terms of content. If you dig deeper you might find some extra stuff that usually wonā€™t see the light of day anywhere else, but we wonā€™t force it in your face.ā€

ā€œYou have the freedom to choose what you want to see, and the community might not be very big, but itā€™s actively and decently moderated. Weā€™re happy with how it is, we wonā€™t water down ourselves just to pander to the masses/get more people. Thatā€™s what differentiates us in terms of community and moderation.ā€

ā€œAt the end of the day, youā€™re welcome to join us at a level youā€™re comfortable with.ā€

If people go away thinking ā€œYea, that contentā€™s not for me, but good for youā€, thatā€™s miles ahead of ā€œI really didnā€™t need to see thatā€¦ and Iā€™m not even logged in, wtf.ā€

Happy to hear thoughts of yā€™all.

  • blue_nat@burggit.moe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    I think this would be a fair change and compromise.

    Because logged in users can toggle both the NSFW Blur and the Auto Expand in their account settings it doesnā€™t seem as if it would significantly negatively effect current account holder users.

    I suppose if thereā€™s a userbase that utilizes the site without an account or without being logged in on a regular basis this could hamper their experience, but I guess thatā€™s where the big question is. Would such a change effect the conversion of non-account holding users to account holding users on a positive, negative, or neutral basis?

    Iā€™m no marketing or analytics person so I wouldnā€™t know what sort of data would be needed to determine that, and if itā€™s even available in the current site version, but either way I donā€™t think thereā€™s any way to tell other than making the change and seeing what happens.