So, something Iāve noticed on the #Fediverse is that there are these reply guys who sometimes donāt quite get why theyāre being called out for being reply guys. No worries, though! Iāve got a little tip for you:
Itās generally best to hold off on replying to someoneās posts with unsolicited advice or ācorrections.ā While you might have good intentions and think youāre being helpful, trust me when I say that most people just want to express themselves without receiving random advice from strangers.
Of course, there are a couple of exceptions to this rule:
- If the original poster is openly asking for advice or help, then itās perfectly fine to chime in.
- If youāve built a good rapport with the original poster, and theyāve shown that theyāre open to receiving advice, then go ahead and share your thoughts.
Now, I know some folks might be tempted to point out that Iām giving unprompted advice right now.
Well, youāre absolutely right! However, the key distinction is that Iām not replying to someone elseās post. To truly be a reply guy, youād have to reply directly to someone else š
Feel free to give all the advice you want on your own space. Just remember to be mindful when stepping into someone elseās space unannounced.
Honestly this mindset is extremely harmful for people who suck at social cues. A lot of āreply guysā on the Fediverse are just autistic people with special interests who see something they care about and want to talk about it. That may involve corrections, or suggestions for, say, what software they might like if Linux isnāt working for them, which is just a way for them to talk about their interests while helping other people.
People immediately jump to insulting them as āreply guysā without even explaining what the rules of conduct are. Clearly ānever give advice to anyone ever unless they explicitly askā is way too broad, because in a lot of places advice is implicitly expected, even in the Fediverse. More often than not, that kind of thing is perfectly okay and accepted, and theyāre insulting people for something they didnāt know was an issue. Theyāre being grouped in with people who constantly correct and start shit with people in replies to harass them. Thatās a completely different thing from someone trying to use a topic they care about to help people and start a conversation.
I find it hard to find this take to be in good faith a lot of the time when they donāt give any realistic advice to actually discriminate between people who find certain things okay or not. I think if these things are an issue, it should be up to the poster to communicate CLEARLY what their boundaries are for interaction.
One time I saw art, and said something along the lines of āLiterally the only thing wrong with this is a [tiny insignificant thing], otherwise itās perfect.ā They interpreted it as me giving unsolicited advice, but I was using the tiny insignificant thing to highlight how good the art was and how little flaws there were. I explained that to them, and luckily they were understanding. But sadly not everyone gets that opportunity before they get blasted or insulted for stepping on a landmine.
If they had said āplease donāt bring up issues with the art, I have a hard time with thatā in their bio we couldāve avoided that entire interaction and me inadvertently making them feel like shit. Thatās far more productive than putting ableist expectations until autistic people are bullied into not being able to have any interactions on the network.
Having these invisible rules that constantly change, where people give completely useless and unrealistic advice that isnāt actually able to be applied to anything, thatās ableism. Iām not saying itās always intentional to be clear. Anecdotally, thereās a lot more autistic nerds here than in other places (hence the example I used with software) so that kind of behaviour is more widely normalised here than on, say, Twitter.
There are people who do clearly establish these boundaries. Usually itās a small blurb on their profile with something like āPlease donāt give me unsolicited advice.ā Thatās all it takes! If people arenāt respecting your boundaries, then I think thatās totally valid to complain. But donāt pretend like those boundaries have been set up because everyone should Just Know things.
One of the traits of ASD is unintentionally offending people. That doesnāt mean people have to accept every rude thing an autistic person does without complaint, and theyāre ablist if they donāt. It means you should be understanding and clearly explain boundaries. Thatās exactly what the original post did.
Yeah, itās annoying that some rules are usually unwritten because everyone else already knows them. It would be more annoying if everything anyone ever wrote had āPlease donāt respond with advice or criticismā at the end.
This rule has been written down now, clearly and very politely. Maybe you or I didnāt know it before but we do now. If you refuse to listen and continue correcting strangers on social media that isnāt autism, itās just being intentionally rude.
No it didnāt, it tried to explain an invisible boundary like itās a normal thing for everyone and everywhere when it isnāt.
ā¦how is that annoying? People write little messages in content warnings all the time, and like I mentioned in the OP you can stick it in your bio and write it once. Not everyone knows them anyways, because even in the Fediverse that kind of thing can differ a lot. I honestly feel like you didnāt really bother to read my entire post, because your response doesnāt seem to be really addressing the criticisms I made in the post and their reasoning.
Again, the OP is giving advice for interaction on the network /generally/. They arenāt just talking about themselves. Again, I feel like you didnāt really read what I said, because a lot of what youāre saying is a strawman.
deleted by creator