The Biden administration will largely undo a Trump-era rule that boosted the rights of medical workers to refuse to perform abortions or other services that conflicted with their religious or moral beliefs.

The final rule released Tuesday partially rescinds the Trump administrationā€™s 2019 policy that would have stripped federal funding from health facilities that required workers to provide any service they objected to, such as abortions, contraception, gender-affirming care and sterilization.

ā€¦

The move comes as many Republican-led states have enacted abortion bans in the wake of the Supreme Courtā€™s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. An increasing number of states have also put limits or bans on gender-affirming care for minors.

  • Pickle Jr@mstdn.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    Good. Medical professionals make an oath to provide healthcare and to treat their patients. They should not be able to break that oath due to a hazy gray line defined from their personal religion.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      As our [Regional] Health Officer said here, ā€œIf youā€™re a doctor who doesnā€™t believe in [medicine], you should find a new job.ā€

      We have so few doctors that we donā€™t need to waste time with quackery, even on the provider side.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      10 months ago

      Furthermore, this is in line with established legal precedent, e.g. the ā€œgay wedding cakeā€ case. If you provide services to the general public, you donā€™t get to discriminate on religious grounds whether you want to serve one group and not another. Thatā€™s how we got segregation.

      If your religion prevents you from doing all parts of your job, find another fucking job.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    According to the article, the rule never went into effect because it was blocked by the courts.

    The headline says that it was partially rescinded, but I couldnā€™t find what portions were left in place or why.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The Biden administration will largely undo a Trump-era rule that boosted the rights of medical workers to refuse to perform abortions or other services that conflicted with their religious or moral beliefs.

    The final rule released Tuesday partially rescinds the Trump administrationā€™s 2019 policy that would have stripped federal funding from health facilities that required workers to provide any service they objected to, such as abortions, contraception, gender-affirming care and sterilization.

    The Department will continue to respect the balance Congress struck, work to ensure individuals understand their conscience rights, and enforce the law.ā€

    The move comes as many Republican-led states have enacted abortion bans in the wake of the Supreme Courtā€™s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

    The Trump administrationā€™s 2019 rule was blocked by three federal courts and never took effect after several states, cities and advocacy groups ā€” including New York, California, San Francisco, the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood ā€” sued.

    The rule would have allowed doctors, nurses, medical students, pharmacists and other health workers to refuse to provide any procedure to which they objected, including abortions, contraception, gender-affirming care, and HIV and STD services.


    The original article contains 563 words, the summary contains 190 words. Saved 66%. Iā€™m a bot and Iā€™m open source!