• Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    59
    ·
    6 months ago

    Black boys, Black girls, white boys, white girls, superstar deejay, here we go… interesting capitalisation in that there text.

    • chulo_sinhatche@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      You know MLK didn’t write that transcript, right?

      Why are you getting sidetracked from a message of unity with somthing so trivial. It almost seems intentional, like you’d prefer whites and blacks be separate.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        I can’t help thinking and worrying about your reply… from my understanding of written English (my adopted language) capitalisation versus non-capitalisation does suggest separation - or at least a difference of some sort. I always thought some humans are black, some humans are white; most humans are both or neither. The way that speech has been transcribed - NOT SPOKEN - creates a difference. If I wrote I was wearing a Black jacket and a white hat that would be nonsensical. My problem is the subtext of the capitalisation process. (Having said that some lovely person pointed out that apparently this is in AP’s style guide - so maybe it’s well intentioned; but poorly understood by those of us outside the… “yankosphere” (Does that word exist?)

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I do. That’s why I highlighted that particular usage of capital letters. When written like this It seems a really subtle remix of the great man’s original speech… perhaps it’s just me. EDIT: first sentence went from “I am” (aware) to “I do”

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’ve had a chance to look into that now. Again, thanks for bringing it to my attention. I had no idea it was a thing. I don’t agree with it - but AP’s reasoning and caveats on their website aren’t entirely without merit. I just think that to the dozens of us on the internet who aren’t US born and bred it seems massively incongruous - and might have the potential to perpetuate the exact opposite reaction to what is hoped. On a side note - good effort bringing something of interest and value to the table.

            • ramirezmike@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              I just think that to the dozens of us on the internet who aren’t US born and bred it seems massively incongruous

              That might be true, but every country likely has similar language quirks for historical, cultural reasons that may seem odd or hypocritical to outsiders.

              • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yeah, maybe so. I suppose having racism / segregation hard-baked in to your language would be a great way to maintain the status quo and keep the little people against each other. For a nation actually born out of genocide, slavery and apartheid I almost want to shoot myself in the face when its citizens still use words and phrases like “African American”, “Native American” and “American”. The inequity is staggering and not even implicit. I hope that practice dies before I do - but I doubt it will.

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Associated Press, yeah? I’ll have a look at that later. Thanks for the heads up. I suppose this might be classed as “semiotics” which, honestly, ain’t my speciality. Just seems weird to me - perpetuating a difference (if only syntactically) between humans with different levels of melanin. I guess from a US-centric point of view it “might” have some merit.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m aware that when people say “save the whale” they don’t mean kill the dolphin, so, no. I’m not what you think I sound like.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Lol. The one person who saw the joke / reference is on downvotes? Looks like the hivemind has reached the fediverse. I often wonder, after being alive for almost fifty years, if it’s even worth having conversations online any more. I understand supposed do gooders misunderstanding my comment in their righteous indignation - but what the fuck did you say that deserved negative feedback? You just showed some love for the brothers and their excellent catalogue. Wtf?